The following Pensions practice note Produced in partnership with Oliver Hilton of Radcliffe Chambers provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
Privilege is the fundamental human right long established by common law to withhold/resist/object to the compulsory giving of information or production of a document to another person. Questions of privilege thus frequently arise when disputes are brought before the Court or the Pensions Ombudsman, as privilege is one of the grounds on which a document, although disclosable, may nevertheless be excluded from the usual inspection process under CPR Part 31 (in the case of Court proceedings) or production before the Ombudsman. It thus, as a rule of evidence, acts to prevent such material from being given in evidence and/or to prevent a witness being required to answer questions on it.
It is also a rule of substantive law beyond civil proceedings to object to any demand for privileged material. In non-litigious contexts, questions of privilege will arise, inter alia, under the Pensions Act 2004 (PeA 2004) by virtue of s 311 of that Act, which excludes privileged communications from duties of disclosure to the Pensions Regulator.
The term 'Privilege' is an umbrella term covering a number of different rights. This Practice Note is concerned with one such right, namely Legal Professional Privilege. This is generally the right not to be required to produce material which would reveal the communications between a client and his/her legal advisers.
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
Defending a tort claim—general considerationsIn reality, many claims are ‘defended’ on the basis that the defendant either did not owe the claimant a duty, or there was no breach of duty or there was a break in the chain of causation.In each of those cases, the claimant has failed to establish that
This Practice Note examines:•why negative pledge clauses are used in commercial transactions •the consequences of breaching negative pledge provisions•how negative pledges are viewed in the context of security and quasi-security, and•key considerations when drafting a negative pledge clauseWhere
This Practice Note considers claims for damages for breach of statutory duty. For guidance on claims for damages for a negligent breach of duty of care outside a statutory duty, see Practice Notes:•Negligence—when does a duty of care arise?•Negligence—when is the duty of care breached?Breach of
This Practice Note considers the position of a security holder who has an equitable mortgage or charge over land and, in particular the powers that are available to complete a sale of the charged property.This Practice Note deals only with registered land.Mortgages and charges over land—a
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.