Home / Arbitration / Arbitration analyses archive / 2018

Legal News

Three’s a crowd—arbitration and the Swiss Supreme Court

Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
Published on: 29 January 2018
Published by a LexisNexis Arbitration expert

Table of contents

  • Original news
  • What are the practical implications of this case?
  • What was the background?
  • What did the court decide?

Article summary

Arbitration analysis: A dispute between insurers and reinsurers has shone light on the use of back-to-back agreements in reinsurance, and how their usage can ultimately relate to arbitration procedures in Switzerland. Anne-Catherine Hahn, of Baker McKenzie in Zurich, highlights lessons for practitioners from a complex case.

Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom

Related documents:

1 Checklists
4 News
View More
7 Practice notes
View More
Powered by Lexis+®

Related documents:

1 Checklists
4 News
View More
7 Practice notes
View More

Popular documents

Priority between loss reliefs in loss making companies

Priority between loss reliefs in loss making companiesWhy does it matter?A company that is a member of a group and has incurred any of the types of losses available for surrender by way of group relief may, without any further rules, have more than one way in which to use the loss. There are a

Late payment penalties—inheritance tax

Late payment penalties—inheritance taxWhile interest often accrues on overdue tax, the late payment of certain taxes may also attract a penalty. For information on the interest accruing on overdue tax, see Practice Notes: IHT—payment deadlines on death—Interest on IHT and Interest on late paid

Strike out—making an application to strike out a statement of case

Strike out—making an application to strike out a statement of caseA strike out order can be made either following an application by the parties or on the court's own initiative. This Practice Note deals with the scenario of the order being made following a party's application.Making an application

Can shares in a limited company that have not been paid-up at all be cancelled?

Can shares in a limited company that have not been paid-up at all be cancelled?A limited company having a share capital may not alter that share capital, except in the ways listed in section 617 of the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006). Shares in a company cannot simply be cancelled without following an