Table of contents
- What are the practical implications of this case?
- What was the background?
- What did the court decide?
- Case details
Article summary
Construction analysis: The Inner House of the Court of Session found that, though the parties’ contract (based on the NEC3 Construction and Engineering Contract) provided for the resolution of disputes by adjudication and then arbitration, this did not entirely preclude the court’s jurisdiction. The court could therefore sist (ie stay) proceedings raised in court, without dismissing them, to allow for resolution of the dispute by arbitration.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial