powered by Lexis^®PSL

LEXISNEXIS_ICONS_SUPPORT

Home / Arbitration / Arbitration analyses archive / 2018

Legal News

SCC tribunal finds gas contract valid, but orders contract termination (PJSC Ukrgasvydobuvannya v Misen and Karpatygaz)

SCC tribunal finds gas contract valid, but orders contract termination (PJSC Ukrgasvydobuvannya v Misen and Karpatygaz)

Published on: 17 July 2018

Published by: Law360

SCC tribunal finds gas contract valid, but orders contract termination (PJSC Ukrgasvydobuvannya v Misen and Karpatygaz)
What did the tribunal decide?

Article summary

Law360: An Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce (SCC) tribunal has rejected a Ukrainian natural gas producer’s claims that its Joint Activity Agreement (JAA) with a Swedish oil and gas company was invalid due to corruption, but held that the contract must be terminated anyway because it is no longer worthwhile after the Ukrainian government imposed increased royalties. Sign in or take a trial to read the full analysis.

Popular documents

PRA Rulebook—introduction for the insurance and reinsurance sector

PRA Rulebook—introduction for the insurance and reinsurance sector

On 29 August 2015, the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published the PRA Rulebook (Rulebook). The transition from the Handbook to the Rulebook was intended to benefit PRA-authorised firms, to access clearer and more concise rules. Alongside the Rulebook, supervisory statements and statements

Conditions precedent in commercial contracts

Conditions precedent in commercial contracts

This Practice Note considers the meaning and use of conditions precedent in commercial arrangements. It also considers typical conditions precedent and drafting issues.What are conditions precedent?A condition precedent in a commercial contract details an event which must take place before:•a

Compulsory winding up of a company—the process and procedure

Compulsory winding up of a company—the process and procedure

STOP PRESS: The Corporate Insolvency and Governance Act 2020 contains provisions which, on a temporary basis (presently until 31 December 2020) impose significant limitations on the ability for a creditor to seek a winding-up order against a company. For further reading, see Practice Note: Corporate

Notice of acting

Notice of acting

Case number [insert number][In the principal registryORIn the [insert court location] FAMILY court]Sitting at [insert place]Notice of actingBetween[insert petitioner name]Petitionerand[insert respondent name]RespondentTake notice that we [insert name of firm] have been appointed to act as the