Table of contents
- Seaport investment
- No ‘improper motivation’
- Counsel
Article summary
Mealey’s: A Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) tribunal recently issued an award in which it dismissed a US seaport investor’s claims against the Republic of Estonia for allegedly interfering with, harming and eventually judicially expropriating its investment, causing it approximately US$206m in damages, while dismissing Estonia’s objections to jurisdiction and admissibility and ordering the parties to split equally the arbitration costs of approximately €3m.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial