The tribunal

The tribunal

Tribunal appointment—multiple parties

This Practice Notes provides guidance on how to appoint a tribunal where there are multiple parties involved in the arbitration and the appointment process, including the position on common arbitrators across multi-party and related arbitration proceedings. It covers the relevant provisions of the Arbitration Act 1996 and arbitration proceedings under the UNCITRAL Rules, the Arbitration Rules of the London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA Rules) and Rules of Arbitration of the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) (ICC Rules). See Practice Note: Tribunal appointment—multiple parties.

Ensuring the arbitral tribunal's independence

This Practice Note sets out the issues a party appointing an arbitrator should consider when trying to ensure their independence. It sets out points to consider when nominating an arbitrator and provisions in major sets of institutional rules such as those made by the ICC, the American Arbitration Association (AAA), the Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce (SCC) and the Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC). See Practice Note: Ensuring the arbitral tribunal's independence and impartiality.

Challenging the tribunal's independence

This Practice Note sets out why and how a party might

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Arbitration News

Third party costs—Court of Appeal confirms stay pending detailed assessment is case management decision (Federal Republic of Nigeria v VR Global Partners LP)

Dispute Resolution analysis: The Court of Appeal has upheld the decision of a judge at first instance to stay an application for a third-party costs order under section 51 of the Senior Courts Act 1981 until after the conclusion of the detailed assessment of the underlying bill of costs. Dismissing Nigeria’s appeal, the Court of Appeal held that there is no presumption that a third-party costs application should be determined before a detailed assessment. The question is purely one of case management, to be decided in accordance with the interests of justice and the overriding objective. The decision, being within the scope of discretion allowed a judge, was not amenable to appeal; that a different judge would have reached a different conclusion was not in point. Where there is a real question whether any further sum will be payable following assessment (particularly where a substantial payment on account has already been made and costs are to be assessed on the standard basis), it is legitimate to stay the third party application to avoid wasting court resources on what may prove to be a pointless satellite exercise. Of general and at least equal significance to costs practitioners were the Court of Appeal’s strong comments (obiter dicta in strict terms) deprecating disproportionate detailed assessment processes and endorsing the use of sampling as a case management tool in cases involving very significant bills of legal costs. Written by Lauren Godfrey, barrister at Gatehouse Chambers.

LCIA launches consultation on revisions to arbitration and mediation rules

The London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA) has launched a consultation on the next editions of its Arbitration Rules and Mediation Rules, seeking input from the international arbitration and mediation community. The LCIA notes that since the last revision in 2020, user needs have evolved, technology has become more integrated into legal practice, arbitration laws have been reformed and the geopolitical environment has undergone significant change. The forthcoming revisions will focus on practical provisions that improve cost management, reduce procedural complexity and equip tribunals with enhanced tools to deliver efficient and enforceable outcomes.

SVAMC publishes 2026 Tech List of technology dispute arbitrators and mediators

The Silicon Valley Arbitration & Mediation Center (SVAMC) has published its 2026 Tech List, a peer-reviewed roster of arbitrators and mediators with experience in resolving complex technology disputes. SVAMC states that the Tech List is designed to serve as a resource for technology companies, law firms and other stakeholders seeking to identify suitable arbitrators and mediators with relevant expertise in technology-related disputes. The list comprises 55 practitioners with experience across both the legal and technical aspects of such matters.

ICSID publishes updated note on potential inter se modification of ICSID Convention

The International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) has published an updated note examining the potential inter se modification of the ICSID Convention to permit appeals of ICSID awards to an external permanent appellate tribunal. The update builds on ICSID's April 2025 note, following revisions to the Draft Statute that would govern the appellate tribunal being developed by UNCITRAL Working Group III. The note suggests implementing the modification through a dedicated treaty, rather than the Draft Statute and sets out draft Protocol language to modify Articles 44, 52 and 53 of the ICSID Convention, as well as to introduce a new Article 52 bis. This would establish mutually exclusive annulment and appeal remedies, depending on whether the disputing parties consent to the appellate tribunal's jurisdiction. ICSID does not take a position on the legal permissibility or advisability of such a modification, noting that States would need to assess its compatibility with the ICSID Convention's object and purpose.