Table of contents
- Original news
- What are the practical implications of this case?
- What was the background?
- What did the court decide?
- Primary liability
- Amount secured
- Insolvency Rules
- Case details
Article summary
Construction analysis: In a summary judgment application, the court held that the defendant was liable as primary obligor under the terms of an agreement under which his company (the sub-contractor) had been provided with a £4m cash advance by the claimant contractor. It rejected the defendant’s argument that it only imposed secondary obligations on him.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial