Order for service by alternative means does not avoid requirement to apply for service outside the jurisdiction (Broom v Aguilar)

Table of contents

• What are the practical implications of this case?
• What was the background?
• What did the court decide?
• Case details

Article summary

Restructuring and Insolvency analysis: The court held that an order for service by alternative means against a Respondent residing outside of the jurisdiction did not amount to effective service as at the time the order under was made, the court did not have jurisdiction over the Respondent. An order for alterative service in relation to service abroad would only be valid where the court assumes jurisdiction over the Respondent by also granting permission to serve out. Written by Rebecca O'Callaghan, legal director, Addleshaw Goddard LLP.