Parallel Australian proceedings do not justify stay of disqualification proceedings in England (Secretary of State for Business and Trade v Greensill)
Dispute Resolution analysis: This case concerned an application for a stay of proceedings in the High Court for the disqualification of a director, Mr. Greensill. The stay was sought by Mr. Greensill on the basis that there were parallel proceedings pursued in private law in the Federal Court of Australia. The stay was refused and the court reiterated that, where a case management stay is sought on the grounds of parallel proceedings elsewhere, it is to be expected that it will only be in rare and compelling circumstances that, as a matter of fact, the relevant test has been met. The judge, looking at matter in the round, held that the relief sought by Mr. Greensill would be likely to lead to significant delay and complication in the final determination of all the disqualification issues against him, with insufficient material countervailing case management benefits. Accordingly, the application for a stay was dismissed. Written by Georgia Whiting, legal counsel at Ardmore.