Bankruptcy and the matrimonial home

Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis

The matrimonial home is a central feature of many bankruptcy cases as it is often the most valuable asset in the estate available to be realised for the benefit of creditors. Because the matrimonial home is also usually the place where the bankrupt and their family live, there are many issues which may affect how it is dealt with. Such issues can often include:

  1. •

    whether the trustee in bankruptcy (trustee) has an interest in the property at all

  2. •

    whether any adjustments need to be made on the net sale proceeds

  3. •

    whether the court should make an order for possession and sale

  4. •

    the overlap with family law

The extent of the trustee's interest

The assets that vest in the trustee are the assets that comprise the bankruptcy estate. These will include all assets the bankrupt had a legal or beneficial interest in at the time the bankruptcy order was made (sections 283, 283A, and 436 of the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986)). For further reading, see:

  1. •

    Practice Note: Definition of the bankruptcy estate and which assets vest in the trustee in

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Existing user? Sign-in TAKE A FREE TRIAL
Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Restructuring & Insolvency News

Insolvency Service reports builder sentenced for concealing bankruptcy

The Insolvency Service has reported that a builder, Wayne Miller, who persuaded a customer to pay him more than £30,000 for home improvements he failed to complete, has been sentenced to six months’ imprisonment, suspended for 12 months, at Southwark Crown Court.  Miller deliberately concealed his bankrupt status from the customer and abandoned the building project before its completion.  He was also ordered to repay £18,000 in compensation to the customer and £1,000 in costs. Miller had previously been declared bankrupt in January 2016 following a petition from HM Revenue and Customs. His bankruptcy remains ongoing, as he failed to make all payments required under his income payment agreement with the Official Receiver.

Insolvency Service publishes monthly insolvency statistics for September 2025

The Insolvency Service has published its monthly insolvency statistics for September 2025 on company and individual insolvencies in England and Wales. The data illustrates that there were 2,000 company insolvencies, similar levels to both August 2025 (2,046) and the same month in the previous year (1,967 in September 2024). For individuals, the total number of insolvencies in September 2025 was 11,101, 3% lower than in August 2025 and 7% higher than in September 2024.

Can liquidators or their firms dealing with a members’ voluntary liquidation limit their liability? (Pagden v Fry)

Restructuring & Insolvency analysis: This case concerns the question of whether liquidators or their firms dealing with a members’ voluntary liquidation can limit their liability in their terms of engagement. The claimants’ primary argument was that it is impossible for a liquidator to limit their liability because there is no express power within the legislative and regulatory framework to allow a limitation of their liability. The court held that, while liquidators’ firms and the employees of those firms may place some reliance on limitation clauses in respect of separate contractual or tortious obligations, liquidators themselves cannot limit their statutory obligations which arise out of statutory trust. This decision emphasises the importance of liquidators’ statutory duties, and that such duties cannot be allowed to be eroded by contractual limitation clauses. Written by Robyn Engstrom, associate at Trowers & Hamlins LLP.

Restructuring & Insolvency weekly highlights—16 October 2025

This week's edition of Restructuring & Insolvency weekly highlights includes: an examination of a decision concerning whether and when the court will make a winding up order on just and equitable grounds in the case of a deadlock (Koza Altin v Koza Ltd and Mr Hamdi Akin Ipek), a discussion of the court’s assessment of the prospects of international recognition and suitability of elevation mechanics in a cross-border scheme of arrangement (Re Standard Profil), an analysis of the court’s dismissal of an application by liquidators to strike out a defence to a misfeasance claim on the ground that the issues had already been determined at a previous hearing and so should not be re-tried (Nicholson v Masood), plus a round-up of other news and cases for restructuring and insolvency professionals.

View Restructuring & Insolvency by content type :  
News
Practice notes
Precedents
Q&As

Popular documents

Transactions defrauding creditors—claims under section 423 of the Insolvency Act 1986

Transactions defrauding creditors—claims under section 423 of the Insolvency Act 1986Section 423 of the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986) allows for the avoidance of transactions which were designed to defraud creditors. Its provisions are intended to prevent parties from disposing of assets so as to

Preferences under section 239 of the Insolvency Act 1986

Preferences under section 239 of the Insolvency Act 1986The purpose of a preference claim under section 239 of the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986) is to prevent a situation where a creditor is given priority in relation to past indebtedness of a company at the expense of other creditors, preventing a

Wrongful trading claims under sections 214 and 246ZB of the Insolvency Act 1986

Wrongful trading claims under sections 214 and 246ZB of the Insolvency Act 1986What is wrongful trading?A wrongful trading claim applies to a person if:•the company has gone into insolvent liquidation or insolvent administration•at some time before the commencement of the company's liquidation or

Where proceedings are ongoing and the defendant enters creditors’ voluntary liquidation but the

Where proceedings are ongoing and the defendant enters creditors’ voluntary liquidation but the liquidators refuse to settle proceedings (drop hands) without payment of their costs to date, is there any authority for getting paid costs as an expense of the liquidation or attaching personal liability
Transactions defrauding creditors—claims under section 423 of the Insolvency Act 1986

Transactions defrauding creditors—claims under section 423 of the Insolvency Act 1986

Transactions defrauding creditors—claims under section 423 of the Insolvency Act 1986Section 423 of the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986) allows for the avoidance of transactions which were designed to defraud creditors. Its provisions are intended to prevent parties from disposing of assets so as to

Preferences under section 239 of the Insolvency Act 1986

Preferences under section 239 of the Insolvency Act 1986

Preferences under section 239 of the Insolvency Act 1986The purpose of a preference claim under section 239 of the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986) is to prevent a situation where a creditor is given priority in relation to past indebtedness of a company at the expense of other creditors, preventing a

Wrongful trading claims under sections 214 and 246ZB of the Insolvency Act 1986

Wrongful trading claims under sections 214 and 246ZB of the Insolvency Act 1986

Wrongful trading claims under sections 214 and 246ZB of the Insolvency Act 1986What is wrongful trading?A wrongful trading claim applies to a person if:•the company has gone into insolvent liquidation or insolvent administration•at some time before the commencement of the company's liquidation or

Where proceedings are ongoing and the defendant enters creditors’ voluntary liquidation but the

Where proceedings are ongoing and the defendant enters creditors’ voluntary liquidation but the

Where proceedings are ongoing and the defendant enters creditors’ voluntary liquidation but the liquidators refuse to settle proceedings (drop hands) without payment of their costs to date, is there any authority for getting paid costs as an expense of the liquidation or attaching personal liability