When a company or an individual enters into a formal insolvency or enforcement process, restrictions may be imposed on the ability of creditors or prospective creditors to continue or bring claims against that insolvent company or individual. This is distinct from the commercial considerations of whether it is worthwhile (economically or otherwise) bringing, or continuing with, a claim against an insolvent opponent.
Restrictions on bringing, or continuing with, claims against a company which is in a formal insolvency process apply in administrations, liquidations and, to some extent, company voluntary arrangements (CVAs).
In addition, a moratorium under Part A1 of the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986) is designed to allow viable businesses time to restructure or seek new investment free from creditor action.
There is no formal moratorium during either a restructuring plan under Part 26A of the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006) or a scheme of arrangement under CA 2006, Pt 26, although parties may agree their own arrangements. Once approved, both restructuring plans and schemes of arrangement bind those affected classes of creditors and/or
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.
**Trials are provided to all LexisNexis content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisNexis services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK, Ireland and selected UK overseas territories and Caribbean countries. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
The Insolvency Service consultation on corporate civil enforcement reforms, published on 25 March 2026, has had its closing date extended from 17 June...
R3, the UK trade association for restructuring, turnaround and insolvency, has appointed Monica Kapur, as Chair of its Midlands committee, succeeding...
Restructuring & Insolvency analysis: This case confirms that a restitutionary claim founded on an alleged total failure of consideration may, in...
The Insolvency Service has reported the sentencing of two men following an insolvency fraud and money laundering investigation. Tariq Sarwar was...
Fraudulent trading claims under sections 213 and 246ZA of the Insolvency Act 1986A fraudulent trading claim arises under two separate statutory routes: •it is a criminal offence under section 993 of the Companies Act 2006•a civil remedy arises under sections 213 and 246ZA of the Insolvency Act 1986
Preferences under section 239 of the Insolvency Act 1986The purpose of a preference claim under section 239 of the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986) is to prevent a situation where a creditor is given priority in relation to past indebtedness of a company at the expense of other creditors, preventing a
Where proceedings are ongoing and the defendant enters creditors’ voluntary liquidation but the liquidators refuse to settle proceedings (drop hands) without payment of their costs to date, is there any authority for getting paid costs as an expense of the liquidation or attaching personal liability
Misfeasance claims under section 212 of the Insolvency Act 1986What is misfeasance?A claim under section 212 of the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986) operates where a person caught by the section has:•misapplied, retained or become accountable for any money or other property of the company•breached any
0330 161 1234