Lexis®PSL Dispute Resolution weekly highlights—2 June 2016

Published on: 02 June 2016

Published by: LexisPSL

Lexis®PSL Dispute Resolution weekly highlights—2 June 2016
In this issue:
Headlines (News updates & analysis)
Court of Appeal—CFA win clauses
Court of Appeal—judicial bias
Court of Appeal—appealing costs orders made on appeal
Limitation—underpayment of court fee
Disclosure—subsequent use of documents
Costs—minimal success
Costs—workshop on extension of fixed costs

More...

Costs—Jackson on proportionate and fixed costs
Routes of appeal—reform
Hot-tubbing survey—extended to 7 June 2016
McKenzie friends—consultation
Judgments Convention—UK position
Singapore—Hague Convention on Choice of Law Agreements
Visitor’s guide to the judicial system of England and Wales
Master of the Rolls—new appointment
Relevant updates from other practice areas
New and updated on Lexis®PSL Dispute Resolution
Updated Practice Notes
Latest posts on the Dispute Resolution Blog

Article summary

Welcome to the weekly highlights from the Lexis®PSL Dispute Resolution team for the week ending 2 June 2016. This week’s edition includes analysis of Court of Appeal decisions on CFA ‘win’ clauses (Engeham), judicial bias (Singh) and appealing costs orders made on appeal (Handley), as well as High Court decisions on limitation (Bhatti) and subsequent use of disclosed documents (Chodiev). As usual, we also highlight relevant analysis from other Lexis®PSL Practice Areas, the key updates to our core content and this week’s posts in the Dispute Resolution Blog. All this, and more, in our weekly highlights. Sign in or take a trial to read the full analysis.