Table of contents
- What are the practical implications of this case?
- What was this case about?
- What did the court decide?
- Case details
Article summary
IP analysis: Shobana Iyer, barrister at Swan Chambers, considers Peter Nowak v Data Protection Commissioner where the Court of Justice ruled that written exam answers, which are capable of being attributed to the candidate, and any comments made by the examiner with respect to those answers, constitutes personal data of the candidate within the meaning of Article 2(a) of Directive 95/46/EC (the Data Protection Directive).
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial