Table of contents
- Facts
- Opinion of the Advocate General
- Decision of the CJEU
Article summary
Dispute Resolution analysis: The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) held that article 5(3) of Regulation No 44/2001 (Brussels I), which deals with tort claims, must be interpreted to mean that the place where the harmful event occurred is not the place where the damage occurred if the damage is exclusively financial damage directly in the applicant’s bank account and is a direct result of an unlawful act committed in another Member State. If there are other connecting factors, as there were in Kolassa, they may be sufficient to attribute jurisdiction to the courts of the place where the financial damage occurred.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial