Home / Corporate Crime

Legal News

Health and safety prosecution round-up—28 May 2024

Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
Published on: 28 May 2024
Published by LNB News

LNB News 28/05/2024

Document Information

Issue Date: 28 May 2024

Published Date: 28 May 2024

Jurisdiction(s): England

Article summary

A round-up of the latest health and safety prosecutions, including a recycling company fined after an employee was exposed to wood dust.

Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
England

Related documents:

1 Checklists
4 News
View More
6 Practice notes
View More
1 Q&As
Powered by Lexis+®

Related documents:

1 Checklists
4 News
View More
6 Practice notes
View More
1 Q&As

Popular documents

If planning permission imposes restrictions on a licensed premises opening hours, once operational can

If planning permission imposes restrictions on a licensed premises opening hours, once operational can the personal licence holder apply for a Temporary Events Notice (TEN) to open for longer hours than those permitted in the planning permission?To use any property for a licensable activity both

Micklefield clauses

Micklefield clausesWhat is a Micklefield clause?It is common for employee share plans to provide that, on termination of employment (or when an employee is given or receives notice of termination of employment), subsisting share awards will be forfeited and subsisting share options will lapse.It is

Financial clean break orders in family proceedings

Financial clean break orders in family proceedingsDuty of the court to consider a clean breakAlthough there is no presumption in favour of there being a financial clean break between parties on divorce, the court is under a duty to consider whether it would be appropriate to exercise its powers so

Brussels I (recast)—domicile (Arts 4 and 63) [Archived]

Brussels I (recast)—domicile (Arts 4 and 63) [Archived]ARCHIVED: This Practice Note has been archived and is not maintained.This Practice Note considers the general rule set out in Article 4 of Regulation (EU) 1215/2012, Brussels I (recast) when determining the relevance of a defendant’s domicile to