Table of contents
- What are the practical implications of this case?
- What was the background?
- What did the court decide?
- Case details
Article summary
Dispute Resolution analysis: The High Court has clarified the test governing applications pursuant to CPR 31.12 for specific disclosure in the context of jurisdiction challenges. Mr Justice Dias re-affirmed that the appropriate test remains the two-stage test set out in Rome v Punjab National Bank, and rejected the submission that a separate test of ‘exceptional circumstances’ applies. However, in that context, the court emphasised that disclosure must be both proportionate and targeted, and cautioned against allowing jurisdiction applications to evolve into ‘mini-trials’. Written by Alexandra Prato, associate at RPC.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial