Article summary
Dispute Resolution analysis: This judgment clarifies the scope of the summary judgment test in the context of a claim for declaratory relief. Specifically, the court addressed the question of precisely what it is that a claimant needs to show the defendant has no real prospect of successfully defending: is it just the facts and matters relevant to the underlying subject matter of the declaration, or must it also be proved the defendant would have no real prospect of persuading a court (after a full trial) to exercise its discretion in their favour? The court ruled it was the former. It held that where it could be established that a defendant had no real prospect of success in defending facts or matters relevant to the making of a declaration, it would not be in accordance with the overriding objective to require a full trial to decide whether the court should exercise its discretion to make the declarations sought. Written by Harriet Campbell, professional...
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial