The following Dispute Resolution Q&A produced in partnership with Ali Tabari of St Philips Chambers provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
The court’s discretion to strike out a case as an abuse of process under CPR 3.4(2)(b) incorporates a number of different rules, including those that may loosely be termed res judicata and Henderson abuse, namely: (i) the rule against relitigating matters already decided (the res judicata of cause of action estoppel and issue estoppel), and (ii) the rule against litigating matters which ought to have been raised in previous proceedings but were not (the rule in Henderson v Henderson). These two doctrines are often brought in the context of applying to strike out proceedings as abusive under CPR 3.4(2)(b) and, although there is a degree of overlap, the two concepts are distinct. See Practice Note: Res judicata and Henderson abuse.
Generally, for a claim to be struck out or barred as res judicata, the substantive issues must have been determined by a competent tribunal already; alternatively, there must have been a determination which could properly have dealt with the subject matter of the new claim but did not. See Practice Note: Key requirements to est
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
Private nuisancePrivate nuisance is an unlawful interference with a person's use or enjoyment of land or some right over or in connection with it. Interference must be unreasonable, and may be caused, eg by water, smoke, smell, fumes, gas, noise, heat or vibrations. Where the defendant has not
This Practice Note looks at CE-File electronic working in the courts under CPR PD 51O, in the context of case management. It provides guidance on how to file a document electronically, deal with rejected electronic filings, issue a claim electronically, file electronic bundles (eBundles) for case
Produced with input from Rebecca Cousin of Slaughter and May on market practice.This Practice Note summarises the rules and guidance in relation to parties who are, or may be presumed to be, acting in concert for the purposes of The City Code on Takeovers and Mergers (the Code). In particular the
For guidance on the basic features of the doctrine of estoppel and the different classifications it has been subject to, see Practice Note: Estoppel—what, when and how to plead and related content.Promissory estoppel—what is it?Where A has, by words or conduct, made to B a clear and unequivocal
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.