Table of contents
- What are the practical implications of this case?
- What was the background?
- What did the court decide?
- Case details
Article summary
Dispute Resolution analysis: The case related to an application made by the claimants under CPR 18.1 at an early stage of the proceeding (prior to pleadings being served) to require the defendants to provide information and documents that would enable them to determine whether further parties ought to be joined to the claim and information enabling them to plead the case more fully. The court refused the application on a number of bases, including that the request did not relate to matters presently in dispute and that the documents or information were not reasonably necessary and proportionate to enable the claimants to prepare their case. Written by Christopher Humby, senior associate at Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial