Table of contents
- What are the practical implications of the case?
- What was the background?
- What did the court decide?
Article summary
Personal Injury analysis: David Myhill, barrister at Crown Office Chambers, discusses the practical implications of the judgment in XXX v King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust concerning the court’s assessment of expert evidence in a ‘wrongful birth’ case, and whether a sonographer was liable in negligence for not performing an ultrasound scan properly.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial