Table of contents
- What are the practical implications of the case?
- What was the background?
- Factual background
- The issues before the court
- What did the court decide?
- Case Details
Article summary
Dispute Resolution analysis: This Court of Appeal judgment predominantly concerned the application of CPR 17.4 to amendments of claims in circumstances where the limitation period for the amended claim had potentially expired. The court confirmed that the correct approach when a defendant can show that it is at least reasonably arguable that an amendment may be statute-barred, in this case by way of the 15-year long-stop for negligence actions not involving personal injuries pursuant to section 14B of the Limitation Act 1980 (LA 1980), is for the court not to grant leave to amend. A new claim must be issued instead. Written by David Pliener, barrister at Gatehouse Chambers.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial