Special guardianship

A special guardianship order (SGO) is a private law order made under section 14A(1) of the Children Act 1989 (ChA 1989) that appoints one or more individuals to be a child's special guardian. An SGO confers parental responsibility on the special guardian.

SGO's have been described as a 'half-way house' between residence orders (now a child arrangements order regulating a child's living arrangements), and adoption orders.

An SGO is an alternative to adoption in cases where adoption may not be the best solution for a child who cannot live with their birth parents such as older children in long-term care who might wish to retain some legal ties with their birth families and who don't want to be adopted.

A parent cannot be a special guardian.

The effects of a special guardianship order

A special guardian acquires parental responsibility for the child. Subject to any other order in force relating to the child under ChA 1989 and subject to certain exceptions that are prescribed in ChA 1989 parental responsibility can be exercised by a special guardian to

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Local Government News

DfE publishes national review of student suicide deaths in higher education

The Department for Education (DfE) has published a report on the national review of higher education student suicide deaths conducted by the National Confidential Inquiry into Suicide and Safety in Mental Health (NCISH) during the 2023–2024 academic year. The review identified 107 suspected suicide deaths and 62 incidents of non-fatal self-harm, with 104 serious incident reports analysed. Findings revealed that mental ill-health, academic pressures and stressors such as financial difficulties, relationship issues and social isolation were significant contributing factors. The report makes 19 recommendations including mandatory mental health training for student-facing staff, improved information sharing protocols and introducing a duty of candour for the higher education sector.

DESNZ publishes working paper on community benefits and shared ownership for low carbon energy infrastructure

The Department for Energy Security and Net Zero (DESNZ) has published a working paper, seeking views on the design of a potential mandatory community benefits scheme for low carbon energy infrastructure, alongside options to support shared ownership of renewable generation infrastructure. The paper covers: (1) the scope of the proposed scheme; (2) potential administration and enforcement mechanisms; and (3) strategies to facilitate shared ownership of renewable generation infrastructure, including whether to exercise powers under the Infrastructure Act 2015 (IA 2015) to establish a mandatory approach or to maintain the current voluntary approach. Under the proposals, energy developers would be required to contribute to community benefit funds, ensuring that families, businesses, and local community groups residing near offshore wind, onshore wind, and solar farms benefit directly from these projects. The paper also outlines how communities could own a stake in such infrastructure through shared ownership, with profits being reinvested locally. It further invites feedback on which types of energy infrastructure should be mandated to contribute to such funds. Responses are due by 16 July 2025.

The necessity of a DOLs order where all parties with parental responsibility consent (J (through his Children's Guardian) v Bath and North East Somerset Council and others)

Family analysis: The Court of Appeal held that even in cases where the local authority and the parents of a profoundly disabled 14-year-old agreed to a restrictive regime for him, contrary to the decision of Mr Justice Lieven in the court below, a deprivation of liberty (DOLs) order was necessary, as Article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) was engaged. Had the decision of Lieven J been allowed to stand, the logical consequence would have been that there would have been no need for any local authority to apply for a DOLs order where it holds a care order for the child. The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal and gave clear guidance that a local authority cannot 'mark its own homework'. Teertha Gupta KC at 4PB considers the issues.

Supreme Court confirms that section 10(1) of Dartmoor Commons Act confers a public right of access (Darwall and another v Dartmoor National Park Authority)

The Supreme Court has unanimously dismissed Mr and Mrs Darwall’s appeal, holding that the interpretation of section 10(1) of the Dartmoor Commons Act 1985 (DCA 1985) grants the public a right of access which extends to wild camping as a form of open-air recreation. Hannah Brown, senior solicitor and Matthew McFeeley, partner, at Richard Buxton Solicitors, and Rosie Brain, solicitor at Clarke Willmott, discuss the implications of the judgment.

View Local Government by content type :

News