Local authority duties to children

Local authorities (LAs) have various statutory duties to keep children in their area safe and identify any concerns.

LAs must investigate any child protection concerns and put in place measures to protect children from harm. These duties are wide-ranging and will be important to various LA departments.

Section 10 of the Children Act 2004 (CA 2004) specifically requires each LA to make arrangements with relevant partners and other organisations working with children in their area, to promote interagency co-operation to improve the well-being of children in that area. This includes identifying children and families who need early help and identifying universal and targeted services to provide that assistance. ‘Statutory guidance: Working together to safeguard children’ has been produced, which should be followed.

CA 2004, s 10(4) specifies who the relevant partners are. This includes:

  1. local councils including district councils

  2. local police

  3. local probation board and services

  4. youth offending team

  5. National Health Service England (NHS) and integrated care board (ICB)

  6. schools, colleges and further education providers

Each relevant partner must co-operate with the

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Local Government News

Local Government weekly highlights—4 September 2025

This week's edition of Local Government weekly highlights includes: case analysis of G (A Child: Scope of Fact-Finding), in which the Court of Appeal considered when a fact-finding hearing is necessary to inform a risk assessment and Saravanamuthu v SSCHLG on a challenge to the validity of a compulsory purchase order. Case reports include Somani Hotels Ltd v Epping Forest DC in which the court lifted the injunction on the use of hotels for asylum seekers and allowed the SSHD to join proceedings as an intervenor; R (Paul Knights) v South Norfolk DC, in which the Administrative Court quashed planning approval for ignoring key evidence; Mole Valley DC v SSHCLG in which the High Court rejected the Green Belt challenge and the application for judicial and statutory review was deemed unarguable; R (SK) v Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead in which the court set aside an interim mandatory injunction in finding that the claimant did not establish a strong case that the current accommodation was unsuitable simply due to one of the child’s temporary inpatient stays in hospital which impeded frequent visits; and Iqbal v Listing Officer Epsom, which upheld the decision that the Class G council tax exemption did not apply to the dwelling in question. Further developments include MHCLG’s launch of consultation on measures to streamline infrastructure planning process and response to the LGSCO Triennial Review declining to make use of revised Complaint Handling Code mandatory; the Cabinet Office’s update of Model Services Contract and Guidance for buyers under PA 2023; DfE notices to improve, guidance on Terrorism Act compliance for the education sector and consultation response on unregistered alternative provision standards. It includes further updates on Social housing, Social care, Education, Healthcare and Governance.

View Local Government by content type :

Popular documents