Child care proceedings

Under the Children Act 1989 (ChA 1989), local authority (LA) social services departments are responsible for making sure that children are safe and appropriately cared for by their parents or the person looking after them. LAs must investigate any child in their area where they have cause to suspect the child is ‘suffering, or is likely to suffer, significant harm’.

When an LA becomes involved with a family in which the children are at risk, it will work with the family and involve relevant agencies and professionals.

Before a court application is made, a child protection case conference should be held, to which parents/carers, relevant professionals, organisations and agencies are invited, to see if the child could properly be protected without a care order being made. The pre-proceedings protocol of the Public Law Outline (PLO) (now set out in FPR 2010, PD 12A) should be followed. See Practice Note: Child protection conferences.

Typically, an LA may start these investigations for any of the following reasons:

  1. when directed to do so by the court

  2. where there is a persistent failure to comply

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Local Government News

Local Government weekly highlights—4 September 2025

This week's edition of Local Government weekly highlights includes: case analysis of G (A Child: Scope of Fact-Finding), in which the Court of Appeal considered when a fact-finding hearing is necessary to inform a risk assessment and Saravanamuthu v SSCHLG on a challenge to the validity of a compulsory purchase order. Case reports include Somani Hotels Ltd v Epping Forest DC in which the court lifted the injunction on the use of hotels for asylum seekers and allowed the SSHD to join proceedings as an intervenor; R (Paul Knights) v South Norfolk DC, in which the Administrative Court quashed planning approval for ignoring key evidence; Mole Valley DC v SSHCLG in which the High Court rejected the Green Belt challenge and the application for judicial and statutory review was deemed unarguable; R (SK) v Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead in which the court set aside an interim mandatory injunction in finding that the claimant did not establish a strong case that the current accommodation was unsuitable simply due to one of the child’s temporary inpatient stays in hospital which impeded frequent visits; and Iqbal v Listing Officer Epsom, which upheld the decision that the Class G council tax exemption did not apply to the dwelling in question. Further developments include MHCLG’s launch of consultation on measures to streamline infrastructure planning process and response to the LGSCO Triennial Review declining to make use of revised Complaint Handling Code mandatory; the Cabinet Office’s update of Model Services Contract and Guidance for buyers under PA 2023; DfE notices to improve, guidance on Terrorism Act compliance for the education sector and consultation response on unregistered alternative provision standards. It includes further updates on Social housing, Social care, Education, Healthcare and Governance.

View Local Government by content type :

Popular documents