Dealing with actual or alleged illegal working

Employers may need to deal with actual or alleged illegal working in the course of their business.

This issue may arise:

  1. at the time an employee is identified by the employer as a person who may not have the right to work in the UK, or

  2. when an employer is issued with a civil penalty notice or becomes the subject of criminal proceedings relating to an illegal working offence

Dealing with an employee who does not have the right to work in the UK

Employers should ensure they have policies and procedures in place to minimise the potential of employing a person who does not have the right to work in the UK. However, doing so cannot completely mitigate the risk of illegal working occurring, eg where an employee ceases to have the right to work (perhaps due to a change in their personal circumstances) or where compliance systems fail.

Where an employer becomes aware that an employee potentially does not have

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Immigration News

IPPR analysis calls for legacy protections in Home Office settlement consultation

The Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR) has published analysis of the Home Office’s ‘earned settlement’ consultation, estimating that around 1.35 million people currently on routes to settlement could face longer qualifying periods under the proposed reforms. The consultation proposes increasing the default qualifying period from five to 10 years, with Skilled Worker visa holders in roles designated as below graduate level, including many care workers, facing a default period of 15 years. Qualifying periods could be shortened or extended depending on individual circumstances, including reductions linked to English language proficiency and higher earnings, and extensions linked to benefit claims or periods of visa overstaying.IPPR’s analysis indicates that the affected cohort includes around 309,000 children and is primarily made up of people on work routes and refugee permissions, with the most common nationalities being Indian, Nigerian and Pakistani. The research argues that applying longer qualifying periods to those already on settlement routes raises concerns about fairness, legal certainty and legitimate expectation, given that many migrants entered the UK on the basis of a publicly stated five-year route to settlement. IPPR highlights potential impacts on child poverty and calls for the inclusion of a legacy, or ‘grandfathering’, clause to protect those already on routes to settlement from retrospective application of the extended qualifying periods.

View Immigration by content type :

Popular documents