Trustees—self-dealing, unauthorised profits and conflicts of interest
Published by a LexisNexis Private Client expert
Practice notesTrustees—self-dealing, unauthorised profits and conflicts of interest
Published by a LexisNexis Private Client expert
Practice notesThe self-dealing rule
The self-dealing rule is connected to, but distinct from, the fair dealing rule as well as the genuine transaction rule. There is authority that the rules are not, on a correct analysis, part of the duties or discretions of a trustee; rather they are restrictions which inhibit a trustee from acting in certain ways. This has important consequences in terms of limitation of any action against trustees by beneficiaries.
The rule against self-dealing encompasses several slightly different rules which were considered in Right Reverend Hollis (Bishop of Portsmouth) v Rolfe:
- •
a trustee cannot make a contract with themselves (subject to statutory exception) so any attempt to do so is ineffective—this was described in Right Reverend Hollis (Bishop of Portsmouth) v Rolfe as the primitive self-dealing rule, although it has also been described as the two-party rule
- •
a trustee's power of sale cannot validly be exercised in their own favour (subject to any contrary provision in the trust instrument)—this was described in Right Reverend Hollis (Bishop of Portsmouth) v Rolfe as the
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it,
sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.