Variation of trusts

Variation of trusts—variation of trusts without the court's assistance

As a general rule trustees are bound to carry out the settlor's wishes, however circumstances may arise where a variation is desirable, eg in the interests of efficient administration. In such cases the trustees will first consider whether a variation is possible without the assistance of the court, failing which the trustees will then turn to the court for assistance.

Express powers

The trust instrument may have been drafted so as to confer on the trustees powers wider than those contemplated by the general law. Modern trust instruments generally contrive to allow the trustees considerable discretionary powers. For example:

•
a power of appointment (this is a power given by one person to another to declare how property is to be held)
•
a power of advancement (this power enables trustees to pay or apply trust capital to or for the benefit of those entitled to the trust capital; the power may be given by the trust instrument or, subject to contrary intention, the power contained in section 32 of the Trustee Act 1925 (TA 1925))

The

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Private Client News

Tax update spring 2025—Tax analysis

Tax analysis: On 28 April 2025, the government announced a package of technical tax policy proposals aimed at simplifying and reforming the tax system and improving tax administration. These announcements included the publication of draft legislation, new consultations, various technical papers and responses to consultations, as well as updates on previously announced measures together with new initiatives.

Sizeable refunds could follow taxpayer’s FTT win as HMRC directed to issue enquiry closure notices in ten-year dispute (Refinitiv Ltd v HMRC)

Tax analysis: In Refinitiv Ltd v HMRC, the First-tier Tax Tribunal (FTT) directed that HMRC issue closure notices in respect of enquiries into 2018 corporation tax returns, averring that it had not met the burden of proof required for the enquiries to be kept open.

High Court makes order regarding funeral arrangements where two executors disagree (Patel v Patel)

Private Client analysis: The High Court has resolved a dispute between two executors over the funeral arrangements for their father, a devout Hindu. In a sensible and sensitive decision which reviewed and applied settled principles, the judge (HHJ Paul Matthews) considered the various factors which favoured cremation in England over burial in India. These included the wishes of the deceased, the views of his family, the strength of his connections to the UK and India, and practicalities such as cost and delay. While the relevant factors and their relative weight will inevitably be fact-sensitive, similar factors are likely to recur in many such cases. What is clear is that no single factor (in particular, the deceased’s own wishes) will necessarily be conclusive, so that the court must weigh all relevant factors with care. Written by Kyle Bonnell, barrister at XXIV Old Buildings.

The impact of the Terrorism (Protection of Premises) Act 2025 on the property industry

Property analysis: In this analysis, Andrew Butler KC of Tanfield Chambers considers (a) the impact of the Terrorism (Protection of Premises) Act 2025 (T(PP)A 2025) on property owners; (b) the impact on landlords and tenants and how the responsibilities and duties should be divided between them; and (c) how, if at all, this will impact lease drafting.