Creation of trusts

Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis

Perpetuities and accumulations

The rules relating to perpetuities and accumulations stem from the provisions in the Perpetuities and Accumulations Act 1964 and from common law. These increasingly archaic rules were becoming troublesome and as long ago as 1989, the Law Commission started consultations on altering them. This culminated in a paper in 1993 identifying defects in the system and a final report in 1998 with a draft bill. This resulted in the Perpetuities and Accumulations Act 2009 (PAA 2009) which gives effect to that report.

PAA 2009 became operable on 6 April 2010. It seeks to modify and simplify the law by making changes both to the rule against perpetuities (also known as the rule against remoteness of vesting) and the rule against excessive accumulations. Practitioners will still have regard to the old rules that continue to apply in certain cases.

See Practice Note: Perpetuities and accumulations.

Creation of trusts—parties, recitals and testatum

Usually the date on which the settlement was made is set out at the beginning of the trust instrument. The date may be important for subsequent time limits and the

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Existing user? Sign-in TAKE A FREE TRIAL
Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Private Client News

CTJ announces non-contentious probate rules working group membership

The Courts and Tribunals Judiciary has published details of the working group reviewing the Non-Contentious Probate Rules 1987, SI 1987/2024. The group, chaired by Sir Alastair Norris, includes representatives from His Majesty's Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS), the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) and legal practitioners from the Bar, private client solicitors and legal executives. The review, which runs until 31 July 2025, brings together expertise from across the probate sector, including a chief master, district probate registrar, and specialists in contentious probate and trust law.

Art under scrutiny—the Ojiri case and its implications for AML obligations

Private Client analysis: Amanda Gray, partner and Katie Mackenzie, trainee solicitor, Art Law at Mishcon de Reya LLP discuss the recent prosecution of an art dealer for offences under the Terrorism Act 2000 and its implications for art market professionals.

Private Client weekly highlights—3 July 2025

This week’s edition of Private Client weekly highlights includes: (1) the case of David Peace, in which the High Court confirmed that the beneficiaries could agree to waive the forfeiture rule following Mr Peace’s assisted death; (2) the Court of Protection case of Neath Port Talbot County Borough Council v A, in which the court found that an elderly dementia sufferer was moved from Spain to Wales unlawfully and continued to have habitual residence in Spain; (3) Mudan v Revenue and Customs Commissioners, in which the Court of Appeal confirmed the FTT and UT decisions that property requiring significant renovations should still be treated as residential property for SDLT purposes; (4) Khatun v Hasan, in which the Chancery Division held that the defendants failed to establish on the balance of probabilities that the disputed Will was genuine; and (5) Haworth v HMRC, in which The Court of Appeal dismissed the taxpayers’ appeal and upheld the decisions of the FTT and UT that the place of effective management of certain family trusts was in the UK, and not Mauritius.

ICAEW reports HMCTS advances in probate processing and digital enhancements

The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales (ICAEW) reports on HM Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS) probate service developments as of June 2025. HMCTS data for April 2025 indicates that although caseloads have stabilised at approximately 35,000 cases as of 31 May 2025, digital grant applications are now processed in 4.9 weeks compared to 12.3 weeks for paper applications. Service enhancements include improved case ownership by support officers, the continued availability of surgery appointments for complex cases, streamlined phone support through merged lines, and targeted improvements in the scanning process to reduce document errors. The update also notes recent Law Commission recommendations from May 2025 proposing the acceptance of electronic Wills and signatures—however, implementation remains the responsibility of the Ministry of Justice policy teams, and HMCTS is monitoring these potential changes.

View Private Client by content type :  
News
Practice notes
Precedents
Q&As

Popular documents

Is a deed of appointment always required when appointing capital out of a discretionary trust?

Is a deed of appointment always required when appointing capital out of a discretionary trust?Generally, a deed of appointment is not always necessary when appointing capital out of a discretionary trust. Needless to say that is not the end of the matter. Appointment of capital from a discretionary

If a rentcharge is shown as being informally exonerated on title information, does this apply to the

If a rentcharge is shown as being informally exonerated on title information, does this apply to the current registered owner? Or does the informal exoneration only apply to the parties to the document which informally exonerated the rentcharge?This Q&A considers the situation where, at some

Late payment penalties—inheritance tax

Late payment penalties—inheritance taxWhile interest often accrues on overdue tax, the late payment of certain taxes may also attract a penalty. For information on the interest accruing on overdue tax, see Practice Notes: IHT—payment deadlines on death—Interest on IHT and Interest on late paid

If a beneficiary signs a deed of disclaimer of their share of an estate and the estate pays their legal

If a beneficiary signs a deed of disclaimer of their share of an estate and the estate pays their legal fees, will that count as a PET against their estate?A disclaimer is the refusal of a gift prior to acceptance. The refusal of the gift must take place before the beneficiary accepts any benefit
Is a deed of appointment always required when appointing capital out of a discretionary trust?

Is a deed of appointment always required when appointing capital out of a discretionary trust?

Is a deed of appointment always required when appointing capital out of a discretionary trust?Generally, a deed of appointment is not always necessary when appointing capital out of a discretionary trust. Needless to say that is not the end of the matter. Appointment of capital from a discretionary

If a rentcharge is shown as being informally exonerated on title information, does this apply to the

If a rentcharge is shown as being informally exonerated on title information, does this apply to the

If a rentcharge is shown as being informally exonerated on title information, does this apply to the current registered owner? Or does the informal exoneration only apply to the parties to the document which informally exonerated the rentcharge?This Q&A considers the situation where, at some

Late payment penalties—inheritance tax

Late payment penalties—inheritance tax

Late payment penalties—inheritance taxWhile interest often accrues on overdue tax, the late payment of certain taxes may also attract a penalty. For information on the interest accruing on overdue tax, see Practice Notes: IHT—payment deadlines on death—Interest on IHT and Interest on late paid

If a beneficiary signs a deed of disclaimer of their share of an estate and the estate pays their legal

If a beneficiary signs a deed of disclaimer of their share of an estate and the estate pays their legal

If a beneficiary signs a deed of disclaimer of their share of an estate and the estate pays their legal fees, will that count as a PET against their estate?A disclaimer is the refusal of a gift prior to acceptance. The refusal of the gift must take place before the beneficiary accepts any benefit