The Reply and further submissions in an adjudication
Produced in partnership with 4 Pump Court
Practice notesThe Reply and further submissions in an adjudication
Produced in partnership with 4 Pump Court
Practice notesThis Practice Note considers:
- •
the entitlement to submit further submissions in an adjudication beyond the Response (typically known as the Reply > Rejoinder > Surrejoinder etc)
- •
the contents and form of such submissions, and practical considerations when drafting them
For information on other adjudication documents, see Practice Notes:
- •
The Notice of Adjudication
- •
Adjudication—the Referral Notice
- •
Adjudication—the Response
Entitlement to make further submissions after the Response
There is no automatic right for a party to make submissions after the Response, and it is not a breach of natural justice for the adjudicator not to permit such submissions (Barry M Cosmetics v Merit Holdings, AMEC Group v Thames Water). See News Analysis: Natural justice does not require adjudicator to permit a Rejoinder (Barry M Cosmetics v Merit). Nor it is necessarily a breach of natural justice for an adjudicator to set a timetable that does not allow for a Rejoinder (Balfour Beatty v Modus Corovest).
Conversely, there are no rules in the Housing Grants, Construction
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it,
sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.