Internal investigation on suspicion of failure to prevent bribery—checklist

Published by a LexisNexis Corporate Crime expert
Checklists

Internal investigation on suspicion of failure to prevent bribery—checklist

Published by a LexisNexis Corporate Crime expert

Checklists
imgtext

The following questions and issues should be at the forefront of a lawyer’s mind when advising in relation to an internal investigation on suspicion of failure to prevent bribery. This Checklist should be read in conjunction with Practice Notes: The Bribery Act 2010—an introductory guide, Failure to prevent bribery—the offence and Self-reporting corporate offences.

Initial Considerations

Oversight

The top-level management of an organisation should be committed to preventing associated persons from engaging in bribery. They should foster a culture within the organisation in which bribery is unacceptable. Consider:

  1. Has the company appointed an officer of sufficient seniority responsible for anti-bribery?

  2. Does the Board, or an appropriately constituted sub-committee of the Board, have oversight of the work of the anti-bribery officer and any investigation arising out of reports of suspected bribery?

Internal reporting/Whistleblowing

  1. Does the company have a defined whistleblowing strategy?

  2. Is it well-known and enforced throughout the company?

  3. Has your company got clear reporting channels for reporting suspected bribery?

  4. Does the company provide a confidential whistleblowing help line?

  5. If

Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
Key definition:
PRA definition
What does PRA mean?

The Prudential Regulation authority (PRA) is responsible for the prudential regulation and supervision of 1,500 banks, building societies, credit unions, insurers and major investment firms in the UK.

Popular documents