The following Corporate Crime practice note Produced in partnership with Harriet Johnson of Doughty Street Chambers provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
Evidence of defendant's good character in criminal proceedings is admissible and can go to either propensity or credibility or both:
propensity—the defendant is unlikely to have committed the offence with which they are accused
credibility—the defendant is more truthful than someone without such good character
Since an absence of convictions does not necessarily mean a defendant is of good character, where reliance is placed on good character it is the duty of defence counsel and the defendant to ensure that the judge is aware of that fact. Where there is any doubt it is good practice for the judge to raise the matter with counsel.
Any proposed good character direction should be provided to counsel and counsel for both the prosecution and the defendant should be given the opportunity to make submissions where the directions were not anticipated by counsel (R v Gonzales  EWCA Crim 2117 (not reported by LexisNexis®)).
The law on good character directions was carefully reassessed by the Court of Appeal in R v Hunter, which concluded that good character directions (since the decisions in R v Vye and R v Aziz  1 AC 41 (not reported by LexisNexis®)) had been wrongly applied and had been given in cases where defendants did not deserve such a direction due to previous convictions, cautions or relevant misconduct. The Court of Appeal
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
This Practice Note deals with the relationships arising between principals, agents and third parties with whom the agent deals on the principal’s behalf. It considers the principal’s liability for its agent, agent’s authority including remedies for breach of authority, fraud and misrepresentation,
This Practice Note examines:•why negative pledge clauses are used in commercial transactions •the consequences of breaching negative pledge provisions•how negative pledges are viewed in the context of security and quasi-security, and•key considerations when drafting a negative pledge clauseWhere
This Practice Note considers claims for damages for breach of statutory duty. For guidance on claims for damages for a negligent breach of duty of care outside a statutory duty, see Practice Notes:•Negligence—when does a duty of care arise?•Negligence—when is the duty of care breached?Breach of
Brexit: The UK's departure from the EU on exit day, ie Friday 31 January 2020, has implications for practitioners considering service out of the jurisdiction. For guidance, see: Cross border considerations—checklist—Service—Brexit specific.This Practice Note explains when an acknowledgment of
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.