The following Arbitration practice note Produced in partnership with Timothy J. Tyler, Robert Reyes Landicho, and Caroline Stewart of Vinson & Elkins LLP—Houston office provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
This Practice Note focuses on the defences to enforcement of arbitral awards in the United States of America (USA or US) under the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards signed 10 June 1958 (the New York Convention). Practice Note: Enforcing a New York Convention award in the USA, considers the enforcement of arbitral awards in the US, including the requirements of the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) (9 U.S.C.) and the New York Convention. Practice Notes: Enforcing arbitral awards in New York and Enforcing international arbitration awards in Washington, DC may also be useful.
For more information on the New York Convention generally, see Practice Note: The New York Convention—the recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards—an introduction.
Note: All references to US case law in this Practice Note are not reported by LexisNexis® UK.
Chapter Two of the FAA (9 U.S.C. § 207) provides that:
‘...the court shall confirm the award unless it finds one of the grounds for refusal or deferral of recognition of enforcement of the award.’
The award debtor may challenge enforcement of an arbitral award made under the New York Convention on the very limited grounds specifically set out in the Convention. The award debtor bears the burden of proof to show that the award should not be enforced.
The FAA recognises all five
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
What is a res judicata?A res judicata is a decision given by a judge or tribunal with jurisdiction over the cause of action and the parties, which disposes, with finality, of a matter decided so that it cannot be re-litigated by those bound by the judgment, except on appeal.Final judgments by
Issue estoppel is a sub-species of the res judicata doctrine (see Practice Note: The doctrine of res judicata). In addition to the general key requirements for establishing a res judicata (see Practice Note: Key requirements to establish a res judicata), this Practice Note considers the specific
This Practice Note considers the legal concept of mistake in contract law. It examines common mistake, mutual mistake, unilateral mistake, mistake as to identity and mistake as to the document signed (non est factum). It also considers the impact of each of these types of mistake on the contract and
IntroductionShari'ah (also Sharia, Shariah or Shari’a) (literally, in Arabic, 'the path towards the watering place') or Islamic law is the legal system of the religion of Islam that sets out a system of duties or code of conduct for individuals to follow so that they may live their life in a
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.