The following PI & Clinical Negligence practice note produced in partnership with James Byrne of 9 Gough Square provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
For further consent issues such as emergency treatment, withdrawal of consent, capacity, professional guidance, battery and Human Rights Act 1998 claims, see Practice Note: Consent in clinical negligence claims—capacity and other issues.
Treatment of a patient by a doctor requires prior consent in order to be lawful. This is so whether the treatment is a simple test or an invasive operation. In practice, issues of consent will only tend to arise following more serious and risky kinds of treatment such as surgery.
Every adult with the necessary mental capacity to make their own treatment decisions has the right to decide whether or not they will accept treatment, even if refusal risks permanent injury or death to them or their unborn child. Nor can that treatment be legitimised by detaining them as a mental patient.
The principle of self-determination is fundamental to medical law and clinical negligence cases involving consent. See Airedale NHS Trust v Bland:
‘Any treatment given by a doctor to a competent patient which is invasive (ie which involves any interference with the physical integrity of the patient) is unlawful unless done with the consent of the patient: it constitutes the crime of battery and the tort of trespass to the person.’
The principle of self-determination is underpinned by the European Convention on Human Rights:
article 8: See Pretty v UK:
‘In the sphere of
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
Coronavirus (COVID-19): The guidance detailing normal practice set out in this Practice Note may be affected by measures concerning process and procedure in the civil courts that have been introduced as a result of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. For guidance, see Practice Note: Coronavirus
Coronavirus (COVID-19): During the current pandemic, legislation and changes to practice and procedure in the courts and tribunals have been introduced, which affect the following:•proceedings for possession•forfeiture of business leases on the grounds of non-payment of rent•a landlord's right to
There may be times when, rather than assigning the benefit of an agreement to a third party, the original parties wish instead to end their obligations to each other under that agreement and, in effect, recreate it, with the third party stepping into the shoes of one of the original parties. This is
Disposal and devolutionThe equity of redemption arises as soon as the mortgage is made. It is an interest in the land which the mortgagor can:•transfer, lease or mortgage inter vivos, or•by will (it passes on intestacy)No cloggingIt is a fundamental principle of a mortgage that there must be no clog
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.