FPR 2010 fundamental principles and index

Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis

Introduction

The implementation of the Family Procedure Rules 2010 (FPR 2010), SI 2010/2955 on 6 April 2011 was the largest wholesale reform of family procedure since the introduction of the Family Proceedings Rules 1991 (FPR 1991). Subsequently, numerous amendments have been made to FPR 2010, notably as to the introduction of the single Family Court in 2014 and a number of pilot schemes—see Practice Notes:FPR 2010—recent and forthcoming amendments and Pilot schemes in the Family Court for further details. The rules are made up of 41 parts, divided into separate chapters and rules,

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Existing user? Sign-in TAKE A FREE TRIAL
Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Family News

Dignity, delay, and declarations on best interests (NHS South East London ICB v JP & the Royal Hospital for Neuro-Disability)

Private Client analysis: The decision that being provided with nutrition and hydration was contrary to JP’s best interests is recorded in a separate judgment (NHS South East London Integrated Care Board v JP & Others. This judgment focused on the delay in bringing the matter to court, which delay ‘compromised [JP]’s dignity’ (para [5]). Incapacitious individuals like JP are uniquely vulnerable and their interests require vigilant protection. Their inherent dignity as human beings requires regular assessment of where their best interests lie. Hospital trusts, charities, and ICBs all have to be proactive in promoting the dignity of such individuals. Disputes between family members must not be permitted to delay applications being made to court; instead, they are a signal to make an application. Family members are consulted to illuminate P’s likely wishes and feelings and values and beliefs, not to ascertain the family’s views on what is best. Sensitivity to strongly held family views should not be permitted to detract from the proper focus of decision-making: P’s best interests. Written by Katherine Hampshire, barrister at Serjeants’ Inn.

The Court of Appeal clarifies approach to the test for appointment of intermediaries (Re M (A Child: Intermediaries)

Family analysis: The Court of Appeal held that in a number of previous decisions, and in guidance issued by the President of the Family Division, an improper gloss had been placed on the wording of the test for the appointment of an intermediary under Part 3A of the Family Procedure Rules 2010 (FPR 2010) and FPR 2010, PD 3AA. The court found that necessity means necessity and needs no gloss and that the court at first instance had been wrong to refuse a mother in care proceedings an intermediary for a fact-finding hearing and her appeal was therefore allowed. The court allowed the appeal on its merits and looked at the development of the law on the test in some previous recent decisions. Rhiannon Lloyd, barrister and arbitrator at 4PB, examines the issues.

Family weekly highlights—17 April 2025

This edition includes details of the most recent View from the President’s Chambers and updated guidance on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) released by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary. Recent judgments, including the Supreme Court's dismissal of an appeal against the discharge of injunctions prohibiting identification of the clinicians involved in treating gravely ill children, consideration of intermediary assistance in care proceedings and the use of a Hadkinson order are also set out.

The Supreme Court holds that anonymity for clinicians in withdrawal of treatment cases involving children should normally be of limited duration (Abbasi v Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust; Haastrup v King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust)

The Supreme Court unanimously dismissed the hospitals’ appeals in these cases concerning withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment for children. There was no basis on which anonymity injunctions in relation to clinicians could be continued indefinitely. If anonymity is sought in such cases beyond a cooling-off period following the child’s death or withdrawal of treatment, the application should be made by the clinicians concerned. Such applications should be supported by specific evidence and the need for any restriction of freedom of expression must be established convincingly. Hannah Markham KC and Madeleine Whelan of 36 Family, Louise Sivey and Eloise Carey of Bates Wells, and Professor Carmen Draghici of the University of London comment on the judgment.

View Family by content type :  
News
Practice notes
Precedents
Q&As

Popular documents

Applications for permission to appeal in the Family Court

Applications for permission to appeal in the Family CourtReforms to the family justice system that took effect on 22 April 2014 made changes to appeals, in particular as a result of the introduction of the single Family Court. The key provisions are set out in Family Procedure Rules 2010 (FPR 2010),

How do you apply for a McKenzie friend to have rights of audience and/or the right to conduct litigation

How do you apply for a McKenzie friend to have rights of audience and/or the right to conduct litigation so that they may represent a litigant in person in court?This Q&A refers to ‘Form C2’ which is an ‘Application: For permission to start proceedings; For an order or directions in existing

Witness evidence in family proceedings

Witness evidence in family proceedingsThis Practice Note sets out the general approach to witness evidence in family proceedings as provided for in the Family Procedure Rules 2010 (FPR 2010), SI 2010/2955, Pts 22 and 24, and the format such evidence should take, including where a witness is unable

What is the difference between an appeal and a review?

What is the difference between an appeal and a review?What is an appeal?An appeal in insolvency proceedings is no different to an appeal in normal litigation. An appeal will be allowed only if the appeal court is satisfied that the decision of the lower court was 'wrong' or 'unjust because of a
Applications for permission to appeal in the Family Court

Applications for permission to appeal in the Family Court

Applications for permission to appeal in the Family CourtReforms to the family justice system that took effect on 22 April 2014 made changes to appeals, in particular as a result of the introduction of the single Family Court. The key provisions are set out in Family Procedure Rules 2010 (FPR 2010),

How do you apply for a McKenzie friend to have rights of audience and/or the right to conduct litigation

How do you apply for a McKenzie friend to have rights of audience and/or the right to conduct litigation

How do you apply for a McKenzie friend to have rights of audience and/or the right to conduct litigation so that they may represent a litigant in person in court?This Q&A refers to ‘Form C2’ which is an ‘Application: For permission to start proceedings; For an order or directions in existing

Witness evidence in family proceedings

Witness evidence in family proceedings

Witness evidence in family proceedingsThis Practice Note sets out the general approach to witness evidence in family proceedings as provided for in the Family Procedure Rules 2010 (FPR 2010), SI 2010/2955, Pts 22 and 24, and the format such evidence should take, including where a witness is unable

What is the difference between an appeal and a review?

What is the difference between an appeal and a review?

What is the difference between an appeal and a review?What is an appeal?An appeal in insolvency proceedings is no different to an appeal in normal litigation. An appeal will be allowed only if the appeal court is satisfied that the decision of the lower court was 'wrong' or 'unjust because of a