Family law reform

Consultation tracker—Family

The Family consultation tracker tool displays the current status and developments in relation to key consultations, calls for evidence and inquiries (collectively referred to as 'consultations') being conducted by the judiciary, the UK Government and other bodies that have an impact on family law.

Pilot schemes in the Family Court

A number of pilot schemes are in operation in the Family Court. They are set out in Family Procedure Rules 2010 (FPR 2010), SI 2010/2955, Pt 36, and the associated Practice Directions. Many, although not all, of the pilot schemes are part of the HM Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS) digitalisation programme, with the aim of increasing the efficiency of family proceedings.

See Practice Note: Pilot schemes in the Family Court.

FPR 2010—recent and forthcoming amendments

FPR 2010 are the main procedural rules that apply to family proceedings, with supporting Practice Directions. In the Practice Note: FPR 2010—recent and forthcoming amendments, amendments are detailed by year from 20207 onwards, together with details of amendments to FPR 2010 made as a result of Brexit from 11 pm on 31 December 2020

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Family News

Cafcass guidance on conflicting assessments in public law cases

The Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass) has published new guidance for local authorities and Cafcass for cases where the views of the children’s guardian (and therefore their independent advice to the court) and the assessment of a local authority social worker and/or the independent reviewing officer fundamentally differ on the final care plan or interim arrangements for a child. The guidance applies to all children in care and supervision order applications under section 31 of the Children Act 1989 and deprivation of liberty applications. The guidance sets out the process that should be followed at any point during proceedings where a divergence arises and should be completed before final recommendations are submitted to court. The guidance requires that a pre-final hearing meeting be convened to identify and document the points of difference for the court. It includes suggestions for structuring the pre-final hearing meeting, a template agenda and a template for sharing the agreed rationale with the court. The guidance is not intended to be used to agree a joint position, rather to make sure that recommendations to court include a clear explanation about why the children’s guardian, the local authority social worker and/or the independent reviewing officer have reached fundamentally different positions. The explanation must set out what the points of difference are so that the judge in the case can better understand these. It remains for the court to decide what is safe and in the best interests of the child.

View Family by content type :

Popular documents