Capacity and vulnerable parties

Capacity to litigate in family proceedings

A person must be assumed to have capacity unless it is established that they lack capacity. For practitioners, issues of capacity may arise either in relation to their own client or regarding another party. Where a party has a solicitor, it is often that party’s solicitor who first identifies that the party may lack litigation capacity. If there is reason to believe that a party may lack capacity to conduct the proceedings at any time during the course of the proceedings, the court must be notified and directions sought to ensure that the issue is investigated without delay. However, the presumption of capacity should not be forgotten, for example, where a person has an identified difficulty such as a learning disability or a mental illness, that difficulty should not automatically lead to an investigation about that party's capacity to litigate.

The key provisions are contained in the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA 2005) and Family Procedure Rules 2010 (FPR 2010), SI 2010/2955, Pt 15 and the associated Practice Directions FPR 2010, PD 15A and FPR 2010, PD 15B. A person

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Family News

MoJ publishes research on Private Law Pathfinder Courts pilot scheme

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has published a report presenting the findings of research examining children and families' experiences of the Private Law Pathfinder Courts pilot scheme in the Dorset and North Wales family court areas. The pilot under the Family Procedure Rules 2010 (FPR 2010), contained in FPR 2010, PD 12B (Pilot) which is annexed to pilot FPR 2010, PD 36Z, launched in February 2022 and has been expanded to ten court areas including all of Wales, Birmingham, West Yorkshire, the West Midlands and Hampshire and the Isle of Wight, suspends the usual Child Arrangements Programme (CAP) and replaces it with a revised process for private family law proceedings. The pilot was designed in response to the Harm Panel report recommendations to reform private law through a problem-solving, investigative approach intended to better support victims of domestic abuse. The research aimed to explore how families' experiences aligned with the pilot's key policy goals and provides evidence on the lived experience of children and families, including those experiencing or at risk of domestic abuse, under the new Pathfinder approach. The report sets out the challenges and benefits of Pathfinder with a view to providing insights and learning for future implementation.

The Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Guide 2025 has been updated

The biggest change involves the addition of three new chapters on consent orders, McKenzie Friends and out‑of‑hours applications.

President’s guidance on non-molestation orders and Family Justice Council guidance on making an application for a protective injunction

On 17 December 2025, the President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, published new guidance on non-molestation orders under the Family Law Act 1996 (FLA 1996). This replaces the Practice Guidance on non-molestation injunctions under FLA 1996 dated 14 July 2023 and includes two annexes, an updated template for a non-molestation order under FLA 1996, s 42 and Form FL435 (Response to a non-molestation order). The revised guidance comes into effect on 12 January 2026. In tandem, the Family Justice Council has issued best practice guidance for practitioners on making an application for a protective injunction under FLA 1996, which includes a model witness statement. This follows the President’s speech on 14 November 2025 to the Association of Lawyers for Children annual conference (see LNB News 18/11/2025 42).

Family weekly highlights—18 December 2025

This week's edition of the Family weekly highlights includes recent judgments on an application for a special guardianship order, appeals against the return of a child under the 1980 Hague Convention and a judge’s recusal decision, applications under section 51A of the Adoption and Children Act 2002 for adopters to facilitate sibling contact and publication of a fact-finding judgment and the identity of a witness in private children proceedings are considered. New guidance from the President of the Family Division on non-molestation orders together with Family Justice Council guidance on making an application for a protective injunction are also set out. Seven new Practice Notes have been added on the defences under the 1980 Hague Convention and setting aside financial remedy orders.