General principles and regulation

General principles

EU competition law and extraterritoriality

The European Commission jurisdiction to prosecute antitrust infringements committed outside of the European Economic Area (EEA) by non-EEA-based undertakings has been the subject of much debate.

Although EU Treaties do not provide specific guidance on the extraterritorial reach of EU competition rules, the Court of Justice has over time devised a number of tests to determine whether, in a given case, the Commission has appropriate jurisdiction. These tests are:

•
the single economic entity doctrine that enables the Commission to assert jurisdiction over the parent company of a subsidiary located and engaged in illegal activity within the EEA
•
the implementation doctrine that focuses on the extent to which the anti-competitive conduct has been implemented in the EEA, and
•
the qualified effects doctrine, whereby the Commission needs to show that the conduct had substantial, immediate, and foreseeable effects in the EEA.

For more information, see Practice Note: Extraterritorial application of EU competition law.

Effect on trade

‘Effect on trade’ is a jurisdictional test which determines whether EU or national law is applicable to potentially anti-competitive

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest EU Law News

Commission proposes sixth revision of CMRD with new chemical exposure limits

The European Commission has proposed the sixth revision of the Carcinogens, Mutagens and Reprotoxic substances Directive (CMRD) to strengthen worker protection against hazardous chemicals. This proposal establishes new workplace exposure limits for cobalt and its inorganic compounds, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and 1,4-dioxane, with transitional limits allowing six years for adaptation. Additionally, welding fumes—containing carcinogenic substances such as chromium, nickel, and cadmium—have been included under the directive’s scope to clarify legal guidelines and enforce enhanced protective measures. Informed by the latest scientific evidence and consultations with the Advisory Committee on Safety and Health at Work, these measures are anticipated to prevent approximately 1,700 lung cancer cases and 19,000 additional illnesses, while saving up to €1.16bn in healthcare costs over the next 40 years. The proposal will now be discussed by the European Parliament and the Council, after which Member States will have two years to incorporate the directive into national law.

Iceland foods loses EU TMdispute over link to nation's name

Law360, London: An EU court on 16 July 2025 upheld a decision to void two of Iceland Foods' trademarks, ruling that the retail chain's branding suggests that its goods originate from the Nordic nation of the same name.

AI developers, users see EU’s guidelines on general-purpose AI models

MLex: The European Commission published on 18 July 2025 its guidelines on the EU AI Act’s rules for general-purpose AI (GPAI) models, setting out its interpretation of the provisions’ scope, key concepts and application. The document outlines compute thresholds for defining a model as GPAI, and for when a modification constitutes the creation of a new model. It also explains when a model is considered as placed in the EU market, which models will fall under the open-source exception and how the requirements will be applied to models already on the market.

EU Commission statement on proposed regulation to streamline financial services reporting

The European Commission (the Commission) has confirmed that it agrees with the Council of the EU’s position on the proposed regulation amending the ESRB Regulation, the EBA Regulation, EIOPA Regulation, the ESMA Regulation, the SRM Regulation, the InvestEU Programme Regulation and the AML Authority Regulation (Regulations (EU) 1092/2010, 1093/2010, 1094/2010, 1095/2010, 806/2014, 2021/523 and 2024/1620), as issued by the Council of the EU on 16 July 2025. The Commission has confirmed that it accepts the Council’s position at first reading although the Commission notes that the Council’s compromise text is weaker than the Commission’s original proposal.