Local authority prosecution powers

Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis

Local authority prosecution powers

Section 222 of the Local Government Act 1972 (LGA 1972) gives local authorities power to prosecute criminal offences investigated by their own departments.

Potential defendants may include:

  1. •

    companies

  2. •

    limited liability partnerships (LLPs)

  3. •

    partnerships

  4. •

    sole traders

  5. •

    unincorporated associations, eg clubs

  6. •

    individuals

An investigating officer will need to establish evidence of:

  1. •

    the identity of the offender

  2. •

    the nature of the act

  3. •

    any knowledge, intention or recklessness required

Consideration should also be given to any possible defences which might be raised at trial eg due diligence, since the legal burden of disproving a defence will be on the prosecution.

Practice Note: Local authority investigations explains the powers given to local authorities to investigate criminal offences under the LGA 1972. The scope of enforcement powers available to local authorities is also considered. The Practice Note also includes evidential issues that may arise, how evidence is gathered, the taking and the format of witness statements, interviewing suspects, interviewing a corporate body and the decision to prosecute.

Investigators—checklist highlights some key questions and issues which

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Existing user? Sign-in TAKE A FREE TRIAL
Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Corporate Crime News

SFO publishes refreshed guidance on evaluating corporate compliance programmes

The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has issued refreshed guidance explaining how it assesses the effectiveness of a corporate compliance programme in six different enforcement scenarios, aiming to provide businesses with a clearer understanding of how compliance standards will influence enforcement decisions.

First trial after FCPA pause offers clues on DOJ priorities

Law360, Expert analysis: On 15 September 2025, in US v Zaglin, a federal jury in the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida returned the first conviction in a Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) trial since the Trump administration lifted the pause on FCPA enforcement in June 2025 and issued new FCPA enforcement guidelines. The case, involving the bribery of Honduran officials by a US business owner, provides early insight into how the US Department of Justice (DOJ) may apply the new enforcement framework, emphasising serious misconduct and the protection of American business interests even when foreign policy priorities are not directly implicated. Winston M Paes and Douglas S Zolkind, partners, and Andreas A Glimenakis, associate, all at Debevoise & Plimpton LLP, discuss how the US v Zaglin decision and similar prosecutions illuminate the DOJ’s evolving FCPA priorities and underscore the continued importance of maintaining robust anti-corruption compliance programmes.

SFO’s crypto probe marks shift in tackling blockchain fraud

Law360, London: The launch by the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) of its first cryptocurrency investigation signals an appetite for using new resources to crack down on fraud, part of a wider move by UK law enforcement agencies to treat blockchain as a mainstream threat, lawyers say.

Health and safety prosecution round-up—26 November 2025

A round-up of the latest health and safety prosecutions, including a roofing company fined after an employee fell through a skylight opening.

View Corporate Crime by content type :  
News
Practice notes
Precedents
Q&As

Popular documents

Possession of a bladed article in a public place

Possession of a bladed article in a public placeThe offence of possession of a bladed articleIt is an offence under section 139 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988 (CJA 1988) for any person to have in their possession in public a bladed article to which the section applies. The offence can be tried in

Unlawful marketing and publication of knives

Unlawful marketing and publication of knivesUnlawful marketing and publication of knives under the Knives Act 1997The Knives Act 1997 (KA 1997) creates two offences relating to the unlawful marketing and publications of knives.These offences, created under KA 1997, ss 1 and 2, can be tried in the

Local authority investigations

Local authority investigationsAny local authority is a creature of statute. Where a local authority acts beyond its powers, it will be acting ultra vires.The Local Government Act 1972 (LGA 1972) gives local authorities power to prosecute criminal offences investigated by their own departments.These

Priority between loss reliefs in loss making companies

Priority between loss reliefs in loss making companiesWhy does it matter?A company that is a member of a group and has incurred any of the types of losses available for surrender by way of group relief may, without any further rules, have more than one way in which to use the loss. There are a
Possession of a bladed article in a public place

Possession of a bladed article in a public place

Possession of a bladed article in a public placeThe offence of possession of a bladed articleIt is an offence under section 139 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988 (CJA 1988) for any person to have in their possession in public a bladed article to which the section applies. The offence can be tried in

Unlawful marketing and publication of knives

Unlawful marketing and publication of knives

Unlawful marketing and publication of knivesUnlawful marketing and publication of knives under the Knives Act 1997The Knives Act 1997 (KA 1997) creates two offences relating to the unlawful marketing and publications of knives.These offences, created under KA 1997, ss 1 and 2, can be tried in the

Local authority investigations

Local authority investigations

Local authority investigationsAny local authority is a creature of statute. Where a local authority acts beyond its powers, it will be acting ultra vires.The Local Government Act 1972 (LGA 1972) gives local authorities power to prosecute criminal offences investigated by their own departments.These

Priority between loss reliefs in loss making companies

Priority between loss reliefs in loss making companies

Priority between loss reliefs in loss making companiesWhy does it matter?A company that is a member of a group and has incurred any of the types of losses available for surrender by way of group relief may, without any further rules, have more than one way in which to use the loss. There are a