Financial services offences

Financial Conduct Authority

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) is a designated investigator and prosecuting authority under section 402 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (FSMA 2000) for financial services offences. The FCA’s information gathering and investigations powers are set out predominantly in FSMA 2000, Pt XI. This gives the FCA (and the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA)) specified powers affecting authorised persons and their employees and, among others, listed companies and their directors, and any person who commits market abuse. The failure to comply with a requirement under this part, for example, by failing to provide documents or information, or providing false information has potentially serious consequences and can constitute and offence in and of itself. An offence of frustrating or interfering with an FCA investigation can lead to a fine or prison sentence. Practice Note: Offences during an FCA investigation provides information on the various offences that can be committed during the course of an investigation by the FCA. This includes failure to comply with a document or information requirement; destroying, falsifying or concealing documents; providing information which is known to be false or misleading;

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Corporate Crime News

FCDO publishes cross-government sanctions enforcement framework

The Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) has published a policy paper setting out the UK government’s cross-government approach to enforcing breaches of UK sanctions, including key enforcement principles, the roles of responsible authorities and the potential civil and criminal consequences of non-compliance. The document follows the May 2025 cross-government review of sanctions implementation and enforcement, which concluded that a published enforcement strategy would assist industry in understanding the range of non-compliance and possible enforcement outcomes. It emphasises the importance of strong compliance and explains that effective enforcement is necessary to maintain sanctions as a credible foreign policy and national security instrument.

IfG publishes analysis on proposed reforms to jury trials in Courts and Tribunals Bill

The Institute for Government (IfG) has published an analysis of the government's Courts and Tribunals Bill, aimed at reducing the Crown Court case backlogs. The Bill proposes several key reforms to jury trials, including: (1) removing the right of defendants charged with either‑way offences to elect trial by jury; (2) increasing magistrates’ sentencing powers to 18 months, with potential extension to 24 months; (3) creating a Crown Court Bench Division, allowing a single judge to hear either‑way cases likely to attract sentences of up to three years; (4) introducing judge‑alone trials for certain fraud and financial crime cases and (5) replacing the automatic right of appeal with a permission to appeal process limited to points of law for cases heard in magistrates’ courts. Although the government estimates that these reforms will reduced crown court demand by 20% by 2028–29, the IfG cautions of potential implementation risks and capacity constraints in magistrates' court.

DSIT warns tech companies on Online Safety Act 2023 compliance following new offences

The Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT) has warned major technology companies that they must strengthen protections for women and girls online or face further government action. At a roundtable on 9 March, the Secretary of State for Technology, Liz Kendall MP, urged platforms including Snapchat, Meta, YouTube and TikTok to implement safety measures more quickly and comprehensively. The warning follows recent government action to designate intimate image abuse, cyberflashing and choking as priority offences under the Online Safety Act 2023, fast-track legislation banning the creation of non-consensual intimate deepfakes, introduce a requirement for the removal of intimate images within 48 hours of being flagged, and create a new offence criminalising applications that generate synthetic sexualised images. DSIT stated that companies must match this level of intervention, noting that Ofcom has issued guidance on tackling misogynistic abuse, harassment and image-based sexual harm and is expected to report as soon as possible on platforms that fail to comply, in order to inform the public.

FCA’s HTX action shows crypto advertising rules must be followed

Law360, Expert Analysis: On 10 February 2026, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) announced that it had begun a High Court action against the global crypto-exchange HTX for illegally promoting cryptoasset services to UK consumers, in FCA v Huobi Global SA, with legal proceedings launched on 21 October 2025. The analysis, with contributions from Nick Barndard, partner at Corker Binning, focuses on the regulatory implications of the case and demonstrates how cryptocurrency advertising regulations must be strictly adhered to by exchanges operating in the UK market.

View Corporate Crime by content type :

News