Pre-construction activities

The traditional method of procuring a construction project where the employer and its design team finalise their requirements first and then send the documents out to contractors for them to submit tenders is being used less frequently. The rise in different forms of procurement and the need to reduce pre-construction timetables, combined with a realisation that early contractor involvement can be very useful, has resulted in the increasing use of forms of pre-construction agreements and two stage tendering. Two regularly used forms of agreement utilised before a building contract is entered into are letters of intent and 'Pre-Construction Services Agreements' (PCSAs).

Other issues of significance during the pre-construction stages of a project include demolition and ground conditions.

Letters of intent

A letter of intent is essentially a written expression of a party's intention to enter into a contract at a later stage. Traditionally, the advice given to employers has been not to enter into letters of intent if possible, ie to avoid entering into contractual relations, until all of the proposed contract terms are agreed. As letters of intent are by their nature very brief, litigation frequently arises

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Construction News

Welsh Government publishes fees for significant infrastructure project applications guidance

The guidance outlines the fee structure for submitting Significant Infrastructure Project (SIP) applications in Wales, as set out under the Infrastructure Consent (Fees) Regulations 2025. Applicants must cover the full cost of assessing their application, with charges applied at key stages such as notification (£696), Environmental Impact Assessment screening (£1,872) and scoping (£3,744) and the main application fee (£196,135). Additional fees apply for Local Impact Reports and Marine Impact Reports (£13,440 each), as well as optional pre-application services and land-related requests. Costs may vary for complex projects and applicants are responsible for any extra charges incurred during processing.

RICS and ICE announce harmonised carbon assessment standards for the built environment

The Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) and the Institution of Civil Engineers (ICE) have issued harmonised guidance promoting the integrated adoption of two complementary carbon assessment standards for the built environment. The RICS Whole Life Carbon Assessment (WLCA) Standard, 2nd edition, effective from 1 July 2024, provides a lifecycle methodology for measuring and reporting carbon emissions across building projects. It is supported by PAS 2080:2023: Carbon Management in Buildings and Infrastructure, which defines governance and management processes for reducing carbon impacts. Together, the standards embed carbon assessment and management into design, procurement, and construction workflows, supporting global decarbonisation objectives and reinforcing industry alignment ahead of COP30.

MHCLG launches consultation on local authority building control charges reform

The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) has opened a consultation on reforming local authority building control services, proposing to expand charging powers to allow fuller cost-recovery from users. The consultation also covers amendments to notices and certificates frameworks, Building Safety Regulator charging regulations and data standards improvements, with intended outcomes including enhanced financial sustainability and improved building regulations compliance. The consultation ends on 25 January 2026.

ILTA publishes generative AI best practice guide for court-ordered disclosure

The International Legal Technology Association (ILTA) has published a Generative AI Best Practice Guide addressing how generative AI can be used responsibly in court-ordered disclosure exercises under Practice Direction 57AD. The guide, developed by litigation practitioners from multiple firms, aims to fill a regulatory gap as PD57AD predates generative AI technology. It emphasises that lawyers remain fully accountable for AI-generated content, referencing the Divisional Court's June 2025 decision in Ayinde v London Borough of Haringey, which confirmed solicitors and barristers face potential regulatory sanctions for failing to verify AI accuracy.