Bonds

Bonds

Bonds or guarantees are used on many construction projects in order to provide security to the employer against contractor non-performance. There are several types of bond including performance bonds, retention bonds and advance payment bonds. For more on performance security documents in construction generally, see Practice Note: Performance security in construction.

Performance bonds

There are essentially two categories of performance bond—the default (or conditional) bond and the on demand bond.

A performance bond is a contract entered into between a bank or insurance company (surety) and an employer, whereby the surety accepts liability for the performance of the contractor under a building contract. Typically for UK construction contracts the value of the bond will be 10% of the contract value.

The requirement to provide a performance bond typically arises from a provision of the building contract and is often a pre-condition to the employer entering into the building contract. The form of bond is usually attached to the contract and is in a form which is satisfactory to the employer. For more information, see Practice Note: Performance bonds—construction projects. For an example performance ...

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Construction News

Welsh Government publishes Procurement Act 2023 guidance framework

The Welsh Government has published Procurement Act 2023 guidance, including a letter from Minister Jack Sargeant to public bodies. Dated 31 March 2025 and addressed to the chief executive, it directs public bodies to comply with the Social Partnership and Public Procurement (Wales) Act (SPPP Act) by consulting recognised trade unions or staff representatives when setting well-being objectives and making strategic decisions. Public bodies must also produce an annual compliance report outlining their compliance over the previous 12 months. Additionally, two guidances have been issued. The first outlines how contracting authorities should assess and exclude suppliers—including their associated or sub-contracted entities—if they pose risks related to delivery, integrity, public confidence, or national security. The second establishes a centralised debarment regime, under which a Minister of the Crown may list suppliers considered to pose an ongoing risk following detailed investigations and a clear appeals process. Contracting authorities are required to refer to this debarment list during procurement to prevent high-risk suppliers from participating.

Construction weekly highlights—29 May 2025

This week's edition of Construction weekly highlights includes a case in which the High Court enforced a loan agreement under the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 (HNW Lending v Lawrence), commentary on the creation of the National Infrastructure and Service Authority (NISTA), a case in which the High Court provided guidance on renunciation and affirmation of contracts, and the interpretation of guarantees (Chugga Chugg v Privinvest), and the launch of a consultation by the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) on the introduction of a statutory build out framework for eligible residential developments.

MHCLG publishes first progress report on Grenfell Tower Inquiry recommendations

The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) has published its first progress report on the implementation of the Grenfell Tower Inquiry’s Phase 2 recommendations. The report also provides updates on Phase 1 recommendations related to Personal Emergency Evacuation Plans (PEEPs) for vulnerable people in high-rise buildings. It outlines progress across four key areas: (1) the construction industry; (2) fire and rescue services; (3) response and recovery; and (4) vulnerable people. MHCLG intends to publish quarterly reports in February, May, September, and December until all recommendations are fully implemented, a process expected to take at least four years.

MHCLG clarifies position on roof gardens as storeys

The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) has issued an updated notice clarifying its position following the First-tier Tribunal’s decision on 3 July 2024, in Smoke House & Curing House, 18 Remus Road, London E3 2NF: LON/00BG/HYI/2023/0024. MHCLG acknowledges the need for legislative clarity and is consulting the Building Safety Regulator and other stakeholders on a proposal to amend the Higher-Risk Buildings (Descriptions and Supplementary Provisions) Regulations 2023, SI 2023/275, to confirm that roof gardens should not be classified as a storey when determining whether a building is a higher-risk building under section 120D of the Building Act 1984 (BA 1984) and section 65 of the Building Safety Act 2022 (BSA 2022). In the interim, MHCLG maintains that roof gardens are not considered storeys for these purposes, and advises the sector and regulatory bodies to continue following current guidance.