Defects

Defects

Defects can be a major source of disputes on construction projects, including arguments about whether something is in fact a defect, the requirement (or right) for a contractor to rectify defects, latent (hidden) defects, the duty to warn about defects in other parties’ work and the appropriate remedy for defective work.

There is no common or universal definition of ‘defect’ but, in broad terms, it is work that does not meet a specification or standard required by a contract due to fault(s) in the work, materials or design, or because of deficiencies in the quality of the work. For more detail on what a defect is, how defects can arise, rights and remedies in relation to defects and relevant case law, see Practice Note: Defects claims in construction—What is a defect?

There is a distinction in construction law between patent and latent defects—the former is a defect that is detectable during the works or during a defined period following practical completion known, usually, as the defects liability period. Note that a defect does not have to have been observed/detected in order to be patent; it is sufficient

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Construction News

Ciarb publishes new guidelines on third-party funding in arbitration

The Chartered Institute of Arbitrators (Ciarb) has published comprehensive guidelines on third-party funding (TPF) in arbitration. The guidelines provide detailed frameworks for TPF arrangements, covering funding processes, disclosure requirements, conflicts of interest, security for costs applications and costs recovery. The document aims to assist arbitration practitioners in understanding both commercial aspects of funding arrangements and procedural considerations when handling funded arbitrations. The guidelines address recent developments in TPF practice while providing practical direction for parties, counsel and tribunals.

ONS announces 0.2% increase in construction output for July 2025

The Office for National Statistics (ONS) has published data indicating a 0.2% increase in construction output for July 2025. This was driven by a 0.3% rise in new work, while repair and maintenance remained flat. At the sectoral level, four out of the nine sectors experienced growth in the three months to July 2025, with the main contributors being private housing repair and maintenance, which rose by 3.8%, and infrastructure new work, which rose by 2.1%. Total construction output is estimated to have increased by 0.6% over the three months leading up to July 2025, attributed to growth in new work (1.0%) and repair and maintenance (0.1%).

Committee of Public Accounts publishes report on major project governance and decision-making

The Committee of Public Accounts has published a report examining HM Treasury's revised approach to major project governance. Under the new approach, HM Treasury will fully implement recommendations from the Office for Value for Money (OVFM) for projects exceeding £10bn, classified as 'mega-projects'. The government has also merged the National Infrastructure Commission and Infrastructure and Projects Authority to create the National Infrastructure and Service Transformation Authority (NISTA), which will oversee infrastructure strategy and project delivery. While welcoming these reforms, the Committee emphasises that their success will depend on HM Treasury and NISTA establishing effective oversight and accountability mechanisms to build market confidence and ensure alignment with strategic objectives.

Collateral warranties and time bars—guidance from the Scottish court (Legal and General v Halliday Fraser Munro)

Construction analysis: The Inner House of the Court of Session held that the pursuer’s claims against an architect under a collateral warranty were not time-barred. Central to the court’s decision was its finding that the prescriptive periods applying to claims under the collateral warranty and claims under the defender’s original appointment agreement were not coterminous. Rather, the prescriptive period for claims under the collateral warranty could not have begun until the warranty was granted—which was some years after the works were complete.