Scotland

Scotland

Acknowledging the importance of Scots law to our customers we have developed discrete content for practitioners engaging in commercial contracts where one party is located or incorporated in Scotland.

Scotland toolkit

The Scotland toolkit is a research tool collating guidance on key areas of law that are specifically relevant to Scotland. The toolkit brings together Scots law content from across a number of practice areas and includes links to Practice Notes, Checklists and Q&As, as well as legal articles and analysis on legal issues directly affecting Scotland. See: Scotland toolkit

Contract law

Scots contract law has in many ways become similar to its English counterpart despite their different roots. Some English law concepts, such as undue influence and anticipatory breach, have been incorporated into Scots contract law and some leading authorities are the same in both systems. However, there are some key differences of which it is important to be aware. For further information see, Practice Note: Key differences in the law of contract between Scots and English law.

Execution

Under Scots law it is

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Commercial News

Measuring loss in charterparty, carriage of goods and sale of goods disputes: a Court of Appeal decision

Commercial analysis: In Hapag-Lloyd AG v Skyros Maritime Corporation and Agios Minas Shipping Company, the Court of Appeal has clarified the law on damages in relation to a claimant’s ability to recover market loss in circumstances where the claimant’s contractual arrangements with third parties mean that it would not have been able to take advantage of the market. The judgment deals with damages for late redelivery of vessels under a time charter but will be relevant to other claims for market loss, for example for early redelivery and in carriage of goods and sale of goods disputes. Anna Fomina and Alex Andreou of HFW consider the matter in their article below. Please note that the Hapag-Lloyd AG, the charterers in this case, have applied for permission to appeal to the UK Supreme Court and the outcome of their application is awaited.

Weekly roundup of HMRC import, export and customs guidance—16 February 2026

Details of updates to HMRC import, export and customs guidance for the period from 10 to 16 February 2026.

CMA fines Euro Car Parks for failure to comply with information notice

The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has imposed a £473,000 penalty on Euro Car Parks Limited for failing to respond to an information notice issued in July 2025, representing the first use of the CMA's fining powers under the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024 (DMCCA 2024). The penalty was issued under Schedule 5 of the Consumer Rights Act 2015, as amended by the DMCCA 2024, and represents 75% of the maximum possible fixed charge. The CMA said Euro Car Parks failed to respond to the notice for three months despite seven separate attempts to secure a response. The company later stated that it had blocked the CMA's emails because it believed them to be fraudulent, which the CMA did not accept as a reasonable excuse. Euro Car Parks has appealed the decision to the High Court, which has refused the company's application for an injunction to prevent the CMA from naming it.

CMA speech outlines consumer protection progress under DMCCA 2024 consumer regime

The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has published a speech by its Acting Executive Director for Consumer Protection, Emma Cochrane, outlining the CMA’s progress and future priorities under the consumer protection provisions of the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024 (DMCCA 2024). The speech reflects on the first ten months of the regime, which came into force in April 2025. Cochrane describes the DMCCA 2024 as marking a ‘genuine shift’ in UK consumer enforcement, noting that, for the first time, the CMA can decide whether consumer protection laws have been infringed, rather than having to litigate through the courts, and can issue penalties directly where breaches are found. She says the CMA’s approach to exercising these powers is guided by its ‘4Ps’ principles: pace, predictability, proportionality and process. She also highlights the CMA’s publication of updated guidance and engagement with businesses to support compliance under the new regime, and points to the new banned practices relating to fake reviews introduced by the DMCCA 2024. Looking ahead, she says further enforcement action can be expected, particularly in areas of essential household spend and in relation to fake reviews, unfair contract terms and drip pricing where businesses fail to change their behaviour. She concludes that the CMA is beginning to see the deterrent effect of the new regime, with businesses investing in training and reviewing practices, and says the CMA will continue to use its new powers ‘thoughtfully, strategically and effectively’ to protect consumers and support compliant businesses.