Scotland

Scotland

Acknowledging the importance of Scots law to our customers we have developed discrete content for practitioners engaging in commercial contracts where one party is located or incorporated in Scotland.

Scotland toolkit

The Scotland toolkit is a research tool collating guidance on key areas of law that are specifically relevant to Scotland. The toolkit brings together Scots law content from across a number of practice areas and includes links to Practice Notes, Checklists and Q&As, as well as legal articles and analysis on legal issues directly affecting Scotland. See: Scotland toolkit

Contract law

Scots contract law has in many ways become similar to its English counterpart despite their different roots. Some English law concepts, such as undue influence and anticipatory breach, have been incorporated into Scots contract law and some leading authorities are the same in both systems. However, there are some key differences of which it is important to be aware. For further information see, Practice Note: Key differences in the law of contract between Scots and English law.

Execution

Under Scots law it is

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Commercial News

ASA rulings—25 February 2026

One complaint was received by the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) about comparative claims made on Practice Pal Ltd’s website for its school management software. The ASA upheld the complaint.

Court of Appeal rules on claims of non-payment for cargoes of crude oil

Commercial analysis: These were claims for non-payment for cargoes of crude oil. The Commercial Court held that an agreement between the parties to settle their differences and resolve the seller’s claims did not settle all the outstanding claims and that the claims that had not been settled were time-barred. The Court of Appeal has disagreed with the Commercial Court’s interpretation of the settlement agreement and held that it did in fact settle all the seller’s claims. As a result, the limitation defence did not apply. Written by Claire Messer, partner and Reem Shour, PSL at Hill Dickinson LLP.

DCMS announces consultation on banning unlicensed gambling operator sports sponsorship

The Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) has announced a forthcoming consultation on banning unlicensed gambling operators from sponsoring British sports clubs, including Premier League teams, as part of a wider crackdown on the illegal gambling market. The proposed ban would prevent companies without a Gambling Commission licence from entering into sponsorship agreements, on the basis that brand visibility through high-profile clubs may direct consumers to unregulated sites that do not comply with requirements on financial vulnerability checks, responsible advertising, fair terms or data protection, and which have been linked to organised crime. Although clubs are not currently acting unlawfully where such operators are not accessible to UK consumers, ministers consider that prohibiting sponsorship would reduce consumer risk and prevent unfair competition with licensed firms. Alongside the consultation, the government has established an Illegal Gambling Taskforce, led by Gambling Minister, Baroness Twycross and involving social media companies, payment providers, gambling bodies and law enforcement agencies, to prevent illegal advertising, block payments to unlicensed sites and improve cross-agency cooperation, as part of broader measures to reduce gambling-related harm.

ICO welcomes Court of Appeal ruling in DSG Retail data security case

The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has issued a statement welcoming the Court of Appeal’s decision to allow its appeal against the Upper Tribunal’s ruling on DSG Retail Ltd. The Court of Appeal reinstated the interpretation that organisations have a protective duty to implement appropriate security measures to safeguard personal data from unauthorised access, regardless of whether individuals could be identified from the data exfiltrated by hackers. The case arises from the ICO’s imposition of a £500,000 fine on DSG in 2020 under the Data Protection Act 1998 (DPA 1998) after a cyber attack compromised the personal data of at least 14 million people. Following appeals by DSG to the First-tier Tribunal and the Upper Tribunal, the ICO appealed to the Court of Appeal in 2024. Although the case was decided under the DPA 1998, the Court of Appeal’s interpretation of organisations’ security duties provides guidance for similar requirements under the current data protection regime. The case will now return to the First-tier Tribunal to apply this interpretation to the facts of the DSG cyber attack.