One complaint was received by the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) regarding a comparison between Tesco Clubcard and Sainsbury's Nectar loyalty schemes in a Tesco advertisement. The ASA did not uphold the complaint.

One complaint was received by the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) regarding a product listing for a magnetic building blocks toy set on Amazon.co.uk by Shenzhenshi Senyi Dianzi Shangwu Youxiangongsi t/a Plum Marketing. The complaint challenged whether the ad was irresponsible and harmful because it featured images of children seemingly under the age of three years old using the product. The ASA upheld the complaint.

One complaint was received by the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) concerning a television and YouTube advertisement by Select Specs Ltd promoting its prescription glasses range. The ASA upheld all three issues investigated.

One complaint was received by the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) about Amazing Giveaways Ltd’s promotion of a £3,000 holiday voucher. The ASA upheld the complaint.

Two complaints were received by the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) regarding the content of ads being of strong appeal to those under 18 years of age. The ASA upheld one complaint but did not uphold the other.

Two complaints were received by the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) concerning whether advertisements for jewellery retailers misleadingly implied that synthetic diamonds were natural diamonds. The ASA upheld both complaints and emphasised the need for clear and prominent terminology distinguishing synthetic diamonds from natural diamonds in advertising.

The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) challenged two paid-for Google ads for Cult Wines, a wine investment company, seen in June 2024. It questioned whether the ads were misleading for failing to illustrate the risks of the investments and not clarifying that past performance was not necessarily indicative of future results. The ASA upheld the complaints.

The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) continues dealing with ads making claims about the treatment of symptoms of the menopause with certain TikTok ads identified for investigation following a complaint challenging whether the ads made medicinal claims for an unlicensed product and intelligence gathered by the ASA. The ASA upheld the complaint.

Complaints were received by the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) regarding four X (formally Twitter) posts from three accounts for Supreme CBD which were not obviously identifiable as marketing communications, their commercial intent was not made clear and which contained stated and implied claims that Supreme CBD products could help anxiety and insomnia, and prevent, treat or cure disease. The ASA upheld the complaints.

Two complaints were received by the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) regarding the paid promotion of unlicensed, nicotine-containing e-cigarettes by Golden Vape and UKVAPINGSTORE. The ASA upheld the complaints.

Four complaints were received by the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) concerning whether advertisements promoted identifiable ‘less healthy’ high fat, salt and sugar (HFSS) food and drink products. The ASA upheld two complaints.

Two complaints were received by the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) concerning whether environmental claims in airline advertisements were misleading in terms of the actual environmental impact of air travel. The ASA upheld both complaints, enforcing that airlines must not imply that consumers can meaningfully reduce or offset the environmental impact of flying through carbon offsetting schemes unless they can substantiate those claims.