Secondary trading and loan portfolio sales

Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis

Background

Distressed companies usually see their debt being traded on the secondary market at prices below par/face value.

The original lenders of record (eg banks or lenders which originated the loan) may be keen to sell their debt exposure on in the secondary market to reduce their exposure to a particular debtor or sector (see Practice Note: Secondary trading of distressed debts).

In complex restructurings, excessive debt trading can make negotiations with key creditors difficult if they are constantly changing in a 'revolving door' scenario.

The Loan Market Association (LMA) (Europe's trade association for the syndicated loan markets) has made significant progress in standardising documentation and processes.

Secondary debt trader tactics

Typical secondary debt trader tactics include:

  1. •

    seeking an enhanced yield

  2. •

    seeking a capital gain

  3. •

    a 'loan to own' strategy

  4. •

    competitor insight

  5. •

    blocking majorities

In some cases, the borrower or one of its affiliates may seek to purchase the loan through a debt buy back. For further details, see Practice Note: Debt buy-backs.

The proper law doctrine (see Practice Note: The Gibbs rule) provides

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Existing user? Sign-in TAKE A FREE TRIAL
Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Restructuring & Insolvency News

ISDA launches consultation on CDS auction lock-up agreements

The International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) has published a consultation paper proposing new solutions for handling lock-up agreements in Credit Default Swap (CDS) auctions. The proposal seeks to establish a uniform treatment of Locked Up Debt within CDS settlement processes—addressing issues related to market squeezes and auction timing. It responds to concerns about the disproportionate impact of Lock-Up Agreements on CDS settlements during restructuring and bankruptcy scenarios. Market participants are invited to submit feedback on the proposed solution by 8 August 2025 to Fred Quenzer, Senior Counsel, America, at fquenzer@isda.org.

Restructuring & Insolvency weekly highlights—3 July 2025

This week's edition of Restructuring & Insolvency weekly highlights includes: an examination of a liquidator’s discretion to convert a members’ voluntary liquidation to a creditors’ voluntary liquidation (Noal SCSp v Novalpina Capital LLP), a discussion of the Supreme Court’s decision on undue influence in surety relationships in Waller Edwards v One Savings Bank Plc, plus a round-up of other news and cases for restructuring and insolvency professionals.

R3 responds to Insolvency Service's personal insolvency framework reform update

The Association for Business Recovery Professionals (R3) has responded to the Insolvency Service's first major update on the Personal Insolvency Framework Review since August 2023. The update proposes mandatory upfront debt advice, technology integration, and terminology reforms to reduce stigma. R3's Personal Insolvency Committee Chair, Nicky Fisher, welcomed the proposals but stressed that careful implementation is essential to maintain creditor confidence. The review seeks to modernise the insolvency framework to reflect current economic conditions while ensuring robust protections remain in place for both creditors and debtors.

Insolvency Service reports 11-year director ban for BBL fraud

The Insolvency Service has reported the disqualification of building contractor Tahir Haq from serving as a company director for 11 years, accompanied by mandated compensation payments totalling £58,963 (including interest and costs). Haq obtained a £50,000 bounce back loan (BBL) for Integral Maintenance Team Ltd by overstating his company's turnover by £200,000, despite the company being entitled to only around £3,000. The disqualification, effective from 1 July 2025, prohibits Haq from promoting, forming, or managing any company without prior court approval.

View Restructuring & Insolvency by content type :  
News
Practice notes
Precedents
Q&As

Popular documents

Schemes of arrangement—convening hearing and sanction hearing

Schemes of arrangement—convening hearing and sanction hearingConvening hearingPursuant to section 896 of the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006), the court may order a meeting of the creditors or class of creditors, or of the members or class of members, to be summoned in such manner as the court directs.

Priority between loss reliefs in loss making companies

Priority between loss reliefs in loss making companiesWhy does it matter?A company that is a member of a group and has incurred any of the types of losses available for surrender by way of group relief may, without any further rules, have more than one way in which to use the loss. There are a

Late payment penalties—inheritance tax

Late payment penalties—inheritance taxWhile interest often accrues on overdue tax, the late payment of certain taxes may also attract a penalty. For information on the interest accruing on overdue tax, see Practice Notes: IHT—payment deadlines on death—Interest on IHT and Interest on late paid

Can shares in a limited company that have not been paid-up at all be cancelled?

Can shares in a limited company that have not been paid-up at all be cancelled?A limited company having a share capital may not alter that share capital, except in the ways listed in section 617 of the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006). Shares in a company cannot simply be cancelled without following an
Schemes of arrangement—convening hearing and sanction hearing

Schemes of arrangement—convening hearing and sanction hearing

Schemes of arrangement—convening hearing and sanction hearingConvening hearingPursuant to section 896 of the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006), the court may order a meeting of the creditors or class of creditors, or of the members or class of members, to be summoned in such manner as the court directs.

Priority between loss reliefs in loss making companies

Priority between loss reliefs in loss making companies

Priority between loss reliefs in loss making companiesWhy does it matter?A company that is a member of a group and has incurred any of the types of losses available for surrender by way of group relief may, without any further rules, have more than one way in which to use the loss. There are a

Late payment penalties—inheritance tax

Late payment penalties—inheritance tax

Late payment penalties—inheritance taxWhile interest often accrues on overdue tax, the late payment of certain taxes may also attract a penalty. For information on the interest accruing on overdue tax, see Practice Notes: IHT—payment deadlines on death—Interest on IHT and Interest on late paid

Can shares in a limited company that have not been paid-up at all be cancelled?

Can shares in a limited company that have not been paid-up at all be cancelled?

Can shares in a limited company that have not been paid-up at all be cancelled?A limited company having a share capital may not alter that share capital, except in the ways listed in section 617 of the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006). Shares in a company cannot simply be cancelled without following an