General partnerships

A general partnership is the relation between persons carrying on a business in common with a view of profit. However, it is not a separate legal entity. It cannot give a floating charge (except that an agricultural floating charge can be granted by farming partnerships). For general details, see Practice Note: The nature of a general partnership and its legal framework.

Applicable legislation

Applicable legislation includes:

  1. the Insolvent Partnerships Order 1994 SI 1994/2421 (IPO 1994)—which applies certain provisions of the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986) and Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016, SI 2016/1024 (IR 2016) to partnerships, subject to necessary modifications and prevails over the IR 2016 in the event of conflict

  2. the Insolvent Partnerships (Amendment) Order 2005 SI 2005/1516 (IPAO 2005)—which applies administration to partnerships

  3. the Insolvent Partnerships (Amendment) Order 2006 SI 2006/622 (IPAO 2006)—which applies administration to partnerships

  4. the Partnership Act 1890 (PA 1890)

  5. the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986 (CDDA 1986), as modified—which applies to partnerships which are wound up as unregistered companies (see Practice Note: Partnerships and the disqualification regime)

The

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Restructuring & Insolvency News

High Court clarifies position of sole directors under Model Articles and the interaction between UK sanctions regulations and in-court appointment of administrators (Re KRF Services (UK) Ltd and others)

Restructuring & Insolvency analysis: This High Court case (which addresses two important issues in UK company law and sanctions regulations) will be of interest to insolvency practitioners, corporate and restructuring lawyers, sanctions lawyers, and businesses and individuals which are affected by sanctions. Firstly, it clarifies the position of sole directors under the Model Articles for private limited companies. The court ruled that a sole director can validly pass board resolutions and bind the company, regardless of whether they have always been the sole director or were previously part of a multi-member board. This interpretation resolves conflicts between Article 7(2) and Article 11(2) of the Model Articles, with the court favouring Article 7(2)'s provisions. Secondly, the case examines the interaction between UK sanctions regulations and the in-court appointment of administrators. The court determined that making an administration application and order does not breach asset-freezing sanctions, even when the company is designated or controlled by a sanctioned person. While an Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation (OFSI) license is typically required for administrators to act, the court retains discretion to make immediate appointments in urgent situations. Written by Joshua Ray and Duncan Henderson, partners at CANDEY, which acted for the First and Second Applicants on this matter.

View Restructuring & Insolvency by content type :

Popular documents