Limited Liability Partnerships (LLPs)

Applicable law

It is important to note that the law relating to partnerships does not automatically apply to a Limited liability partnership (LLP), unless otherwise provided. Unlike general partnerships, LLPs have a separate legal personality. LLPs were essentially created to deal with potentially large negligence claims against entities which could bankrupt the underlying partners, who may not necessarily have done anything wrong themselves. Many professional service firms, such as solicitors and accountants, trade as LLPs. The most important distinction between LLPs and general partnerships is that (i) individual members of an LLP will not prima facie be liable for its negligence (unless they are the cause of it) and (ii) the members do not have open-ended personal liability on the LLP's insolvency.

Applicable legislation includes:

  1. the Limited Liability Partnership Act 2000

  2. the Limited Liability Partnerships Regulations 2001, SI 2001/1090 (LLPR 2001) (as amended)—which apply the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986) and Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016 SI 2016/1024 (IR 2016) to LLPs, subject to necessary modifications

  3. the Limited Liability Partnerships (Amendment etc) Regulations 2021, SI 2021/60—which apply

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Restructuring & Insolvency News

High Court clarifies position of sole directors under Model Articles and the interaction between UK sanctions regulations and in-court appointment of administrators (Re KRF Services (UK) Ltd and others)

Restructuring & Insolvency analysis: This High Court case (which addresses two important issues in UK company law and sanctions regulations) will be of interest to insolvency practitioners, corporate and restructuring lawyers, sanctions lawyers, and businesses and individuals which are affected by sanctions. Firstly, it clarifies the position of sole directors under the Model Articles for private limited companies. The court ruled that a sole director can validly pass board resolutions and bind the company, regardless of whether they have always been the sole director or were previously part of a multi-member board. This interpretation resolves conflicts between Article 7(2) and Article 11(2) of the Model Articles, with the court favouring Article 7(2)'s provisions. Secondly, the case examines the interaction between UK sanctions regulations and the in-court appointment of administrators. The court determined that making an administration application and order does not breach asset-freezing sanctions, even when the company is designated or controlled by a sanctioned person. While an Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation (OFSI) license is typically required for administrators to act, the court retains discretion to make immediate appointments in urgent situations. Written by Joshua Ray and Duncan Henderson, partners at CANDEY, which acted for the First and Second Applicants on this matter.

View Restructuring & Insolvency by content type :

Popular documents