Employing civil servants

Civil servants are employed by the Crown, excluding those who are employed by Parliament and other public bodies. Therefore while there are close to six million public sector employees in the UK, only about 500,000 of these are civil servants. See Office for National Statistics: Public sector employment, UK Statistical bulletins.

The Civil Service is an integral and key part of the government of the UK. It supports the government of the day in developing and implementing its policies, and in delivering public services. Civil servants are accountable to ministers, who in turn are accountable to Parliament.

Servants of the Crown are treated in common law as a separate category of employee, ie traditionally they were regarded as not having a contract of service and, in terms of constitutional theory, can be dismissed at will. However, case law has established that civil servants do have contractual rights (R v Lord Chancellor’s Department, ex parte Nangle). Section 191 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 extends statutory protection to civil servants, and section 205 of the Equality

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Public Law News

Procedure Committee rejects Commons recognition for technical groups of MPs

The House of Commons Procedure Committee published its third report of session 2024–25, rejecting the formal recognition of technical groups in parliamentary procedure. The Committee found that these groups have no basis in the Standing Orders and do not meet the regulatory and transparency obligations required of registered political parties. The report also addressed the use of the term ‘independent’ for Members of Parliament who lose party affiliation during a term. To improve clarity, the Committee proposed that the House Administration trial updates to the parliamentary website to make MPs’ party affiliation histories more visible and to clarify the use of the ‘independent’ label. The Committee noted that independent MPs currently enjoy broadly equivalent procedural rights to those of party-affiliated members.

New Cabinet Office dashboards track implementation of public inquiry recommendations

The Cabinet Office has published a new collection gathering details of public inquiry recommendations made since 2024, and the government's responses, providing a new resource for tracking government actions and implementation. The collection entitled ‘Public Inquiries: Recommendations and the Government Response’ will provide access to interactive dashboards for each public inquiry, recording inquiry recommendations and the government’s commitments in response to those recommendations, plus updates on their implementation by the departments/bodies responsible. At launch, the collection includes dashboards for the Infected Blood Inquiry report of 20 May 2024 and the Grenfell Tower Inquiry Phase 2 report of 4 September 2024. The dashboards will be updated periodically to record implementation progress. Additional dashboards will also be added in due course. Recommendations made by the Infected Blood Inquiry additional report of 9 July 2025 will be included in the next update, as well as the recommendations of the UK Covid 19 Inquiry (Module 1) report.

State aid—weekly round-up 23 July 2025

A round-up of key developments on State aid, first reported by the Lexis+ Competition team. This update covers the period 16–22 July 2025.

Supreme Court confirms cumulative approach to public interest exemptions under FIA 2000

The UK Supreme Court has held that when information falls under multiple qualified exemptions (QEs) in the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FIA 2000), public authorities may consider the combined public interest in maintaining all applicable exemptions. The Court rejected the ‘independent approach,’ which would have required each exemption to be assessed separately. Dr Lewis Graham of Christ's College Cambridge and the Public Law team at LexisNexis comment on the implications of the judgment.