Human rights

Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis

The Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA 1998) was introduced to give domestic effect to the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), making the Convention rights enforceable in domestic law.

The ECHR is an international treaty reflecting the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights 1948. The UK ratified the ECHR in 1951, but it only became binding in UK law with the introduction of HRA 1998.

Convention rights

The ECHR sets out the rights and freedoms which the parties are required to respect:

  1. •

    Article 2—right to life

  2. •

    Article 3—prohibition of torture

  3. •

    Article 4—prohibition of slavery and forced labour

  4. •

    Article 5—right to liberty and security

  5. •

    Article 6—right to a fair trial

  6. •

    Article 7—no punishment without law

  7. •

    Article 8—right to respect for private and family life

  8. •

    Article 9—freedom of thought, conscience and religion

  9. •

    Article 10—freedom of expression

  10. •

    Article 11—freedom of association

  11. •

    Article 12—right to marry

  12. •

    Article 14—prohibition from discrimination

  13. •

    Article 16—restriction on political activities of aliens

  14. •

    Article 17—prohibition of abuse of rights

  15. •

    Article 18—limitation on use of restrictions on rights

  16. •

    First Protocol: Article 1—protection of property

  17. •

    First

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Existing user? Sign-in TAKE A FREE TRIAL
Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Public Law News

Cabinet Office updates guide to making legislation

The Cabinet Office has published an update to its guide to making legislation, which sets out the procedures for preparing primary legislation and taking it through Parliament. A new version of the guide was published in February 2025. In the update, section 10.4 (on the legal status of explanatory notes) has been revised.

Public Law case law quarterly—Q2 2025

The Public Law case law quarterly provides details and analysis of notable judgments collated by the Lexis+® UK Public Law team each quarter. Highlights in this edition include analysis of the Supreme Court’s decision in For Women Scotland v Scottish Ministers, which confirmed that ‘sex’ under the Equality Act 2010 (EqA 2010) refers to biological sex. This edition also looks at Supreme Court decisions on the Special Immigration Appeals Commission’s role in national security appeals, anonymity and freedom of expression in the context of litigation involving NHS Trusts, and statutory interpretation and procedure in a case concerning rights of the public under the Dartmoor Commons Act 1985. Also in this edition, the European Court of Human Rights decision in Green v United Kingdom, which examined the margin of appreciation in the context of parliamentary privilege. Court of Appeal decisions highlighted in this edition concern recognition of non-binary gender under the Gender Recognition Act 2004, DOLs orders and Article 5 ECHR, Article 14 ECHR challenges to employment legislation, regulatory compliance in planning decisions, and amendments to the Public Order Act 1986. Further analysis considers legitimate expectation from oral statements, extensions of time in judicial review, recusal applications in cases of possible judicial bias, challenges to the removal of VAT exemptions for private school fees, applications to lift the automatic suspension in public procurement challenges, and the consequences of misusing AI in court proceedings.

High Court orders thorough and independent investigation into MI5 false evidence

In HM Attorney General for England and Wales v British Broadcasting Corp; R (on the application of ‘Beth’) v The Investigatory Powers Tribunal [2025] EWHC 1669 (KB), the High Court rejected findings from two investigations into MI5's provision of false evidence regarding an informant known as ‘X’. The court found major procedural deficiencies in both MI5's internal investigation and an external review by former Head of the Government Legal Department, Sir Jonathan Jones KC. The judgment called for a new independent investigation and criticised MI5's continued reliance on ‘neither confirm nor deny’ policies in legal proceedings. The case arose from MI5 providing false evidence in 2022 injunction proceedings brought by the Attorney General against the BBC. The Centre for Women’s Justice issued a statement on the ruling and its wider implications.

SLSC publishes 30th report of session 2024–2025

The House of Lords Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee (SLSC) has published its 30th Report of Session 2024–2025, drawing attention to the Draft Terrorism Act 2000 (Proscribed Organisations) (Amendment) Order 2025, which proposes the proscription of three groups—Palestine Action, Maniacs Murder Cult and the Russian Imperial Movement—under counter-terrorism legislation, and the Water Supply and Sewerage Services (Customer Service Standards) (Amendment) Regulations 2025, which update the Guaranteed Standards Scheme for the first time in 25 years but include an indexation mechanism that may not function as intended. The report also highlights instruments of interest including the Draft Warm Home Discount (Amendment) Regulations 2025, which expand eligibility and funding for energy bill support; the Draft Oliver McGowan Code of Practice on statutory learning disability and autism training, which sets standards for mandatory training in health and social care; and the Allocation of Housing (Qualification Criteria for Victims of Domestic Abuse and Care Leavers) (England) Regulations 2025, SI 2025/706, which standardise exemptions from local connection requirements across England.

View Public Law by content type :  
News
Practice notes
Precedents
Q&As

Popular documents

Convention rights—structure of qualified rights

Convention rights—structure of qualified rightsThe rights preserved under the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), as set out in the Human Rights Act 1998, Sch 1, can be broadly divided into three groups:•absolute rights—which cannot be interfered with by the state or derogated from even in a

Are universities, higher education institutions and/or further education colleges operating in Wales

Are universities, higher education institutions and/or further education colleges operating in Wales considered public authorities for the purposes of the Human Rights Act 1998?The Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA 1998) requires public authorities not to act in ways which are incompatible with the rights

Judicial deference and the margin of appreciation

Judicial deference and the margin of appreciationJudicial deference is also known as the principle that ‘respect is a central concept in judicial review’. It is not limited to cases involving human rights. In cases involving human rights, however, it concerns the weight that the courts will give to

Priority between loss reliefs in loss making companies

Priority between loss reliefs in loss making companiesWhy does it matter?A company that is a member of a group and has incurred any of the types of losses available for surrender by way of group relief may, without any further rules, have more than one way in which to use the loss. There are a
Convention rights—structure of qualified rights

Convention rights—structure of qualified rights

Convention rights—structure of qualified rightsThe rights preserved under the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), as set out in the Human Rights Act 1998, Sch 1, can be broadly divided into three groups:•absolute rights—which cannot be interfered with by the state or derogated from even in a

Are universities, higher education institutions and/or further education colleges operating in Wales

Are universities, higher education institutions and/or further education colleges operating in Wales

Are universities, higher education institutions and/or further education colleges operating in Wales considered public authorities for the purposes of the Human Rights Act 1998?The Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA 1998) requires public authorities not to act in ways which are incompatible with the rights

Judicial deference and the margin of appreciation

Judicial deference and the margin of appreciation

Judicial deference and the margin of appreciationJudicial deference is also known as the principle that ‘respect is a central concept in judicial review’. It is not limited to cases involving human rights. In cases involving human rights, however, it concerns the weight that the courts will give to

Priority between loss reliefs in loss making companies

Priority between loss reliefs in loss making companies

Priority between loss reliefs in loss making companiesWhy does it matter?A company that is a member of a group and has incurred any of the types of losses available for surrender by way of group relief may, without any further rules, have more than one way in which to use the loss. There are a