Insurance and leases

Who insures?

Where property is let, the landlord will usually be responsible for arranging insurance of the building, whilst recovering the cost of that insurance from the tenant(s). The landlord will clearly need to insure where the lease is of part only of a building, but even in the case of a lease of the whole of a single building the landlord may well prefer to retain control of the insurance so as to be sure that the building is fully covered at all times.

For further guidance, see Practice Note: Insurance issues for tenants — Who insures?.

Where the landlord insures, it is advisable to include specific tenant covenants:

•
against insuring the building (to avoid the risk of double insurance and the possible effect this might have on the recovery of insurance monies under the landlord's policy)
•
not to do, or fail to do, anything which would lead to the landlord's insurance becoming void or voidable

For further guidance, see Practice Note: Insurance—non-vitiation (non-invalidation) clauses.

Policies usually include a 'noted interest' clause which entitles tenants to be notified of any claim, or

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Property News

WRA announces mandatory registration for all paid accommodation providers in Wales

The Welsh Revenue Authority (WRA) has announced that all accommodation providers charging for overnight stays in Wales will be legally required to register with the WRA. The new legislation applies to all forms of paid visitor accommodation—including spare rooms, holiday cottages, cabins, campsites, and hotels—regardless of the frequency of letting. Registration will open in autumn 2026 and will include penalties for non-compliance. This measure aims to support councils in implementing the Visitor Levy.

MHCLG publishes draft Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Bill and accompanying consultation on banning leasehold flats

The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) has published a draft Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Bill on 27 January 2026 for pre-legislative scrutiny. It sets out proposals to reform the commonhold model, making it easier for existing leaseholders to voluntarily convert their buildings to commonhold and to ban the use of leasehold for most new flats. This follows recommendations from the Law Commission and the Commonhold White Paper published in March 2025.

Occupiers’ liability and the threshold test for duty of care (Lillystone v Bradgate)

PI & Clinical Negligence analysis: Upon appeal, the High Court found that a claimant casual footballer paying to play a ‘knockabout’ game at school premises where there were no arrangements in place to retrieve a ball kicked out of play into another part of the defendant’s sports facilities (adjacent sports playing fields) caused his own injury when he climbed a 2.1m gate and severely lacerated his hand. The claimant was a trespasser while climbing the gate between two adjacent parts of the premises where he was not a trespasser. The defendant’s duty of care did not extend to providing any system or facilities to aid ball retrievable, despite the trial judge’s findings that doing nothing and waiting was ‘not what football players would do’. The threshold test imposing a duty of care was not met because the claimant decided to climb the locked gate to gain access to adjacent playing fields. What amounts to ‘reasonable’ safety of visitors under section 2(2) and (5) of the Occupiers’ Liability Act 1957 (OLA 1957) appears to fall firmly within the characteristics equating to a definition of ‘reasonable’ amounting to ‘adequate’, rather than equating to the dictionary definition of reasonable ‘based on or using good judgment and therefore fair and practical’. On the facts and circumstances of this case the sports premises were safe, despite there being no facility for ball retrieval. The danger to the claimant only arose because the claimant decided to take a risk to climb a gate that was an obvious danger. Written by Abigail Holt, barrister at Garden Court Chambers.

BPF responds to GLA and MHCLG consultations on London housebuilding measures

The British Property Federation (BPF) has published its responses to consultations by the Greater London Authority (GLA) and the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) on measures to support housebuilding in London. BPF welcomes the proposals as a step in the right direction to improve scheme viability and accelerate housing delivery in the capital. However, it says the measures do not go far enough to address London’s structural viability challenges. BPF highlights concerns including the short, time-limited nature of the proposed relief, the exclusion of some housing models, barriers facing small and medium-sized developers, and the limited scale of Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) relief.